I feel pretty certain that Limbaugh's isn't it though. The details of "the answer" might even end up being similar to his for all I know, but nobody unconcerned with the cost of victory should be able to dictate the path to victory.
I fully expect a response along the lines of "he's obviously concerned with the cost of failure", but that isn't the point. Yes, we're all concerned with the cost of failure, even those "America-hating Liberals who want to see women in burkhas" you keep spouting about.
(Do you REALLY think there's some massive group of Americans who welcome that type of option? Seriously? Because you sound like a complete loon when you say it, as does Rush, Sean Hannity, O'Reilly, or anyone else just trying to stir s4 in favor of their side.)
But Limbaugh - as far as I can tell - is by definition unconcerned with the cost of victory. He's never given me the impression that he cares how many people we torture, kill, imprison unjustly, etc - I've never seen an indication that it concerns him. That ideology is not worth supporting, and is not one I want to see win, even if it pretends to carry "my" flag. |