|
Holy cow! 40,000 US deserters since 2000?! | by Illiad | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Just goes to show .. | by subbywan | 2006-09-08 09:19:54 |
|
Here's the line that makes me groan... | by esbita | 2006-09-08 09:43:02 |
|
If they sign up for something that was | by Peace_man | 2006-09-08 09:49:48 |
|
Um, it's the MILITARY | by subbywan | 2006-09-08 10:07:41 |
| ??? |
by Peace_man |
2006-09-08 10:14:02 |
It might be a typo, but it sounds intriguing: "These are the ones who wanted all the benefits of risking your life, without actually risking their lives."
You're talking about GWB and his henchmen, aren't you? >:-D
If the US military were simply a mercenary army for hire, then I would agree with you. But it is supposed to be used only to defend the USA. The war in Iraq is not doing that. Notice the comment from the soldier willing to fight in Afghanistan, but not Iraq? He got it right. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Um, no, it's not. | by subbywan | 2006-09-08 10:16:11 |
|
I have been told that the oath soldiers give | by Peace_man | 2006-09-08 10:20:34 |
|
Great. Show me where the constitution says | by subbywan | 2006-09-08 10:22:06 |
|
International law should be followed. I don't | by Peace_man | 2006-09-08 10:25:52 |
|
So, they're NOT actually bound to it then? | by subbywan | 2006-09-08 10:28:33 |
|
The constitution Expressly forbids | by joecrouse | 2006-09-08 10:38:32 |
|
The specific oath states | by DesertRat66 | 2006-09-08 10:29:53 |
|
Dang it you beat me to it by seconds!!!! | by joecrouse | 2006-09-08 10:39:34 |
|
I don't | by DesertRat66 | 2006-09-08 10:42:47 |
|
I took it once and took it seriously | by joecrouse | 2006-09-08 10:43:32 |
|
Same here. (n/t) | by TheRantingGeek | 2006-09-08 11:17:11 |
|
Formal oaths of allegence | by joecrouse | 2006-09-08 10:36:14 |
|
As you can see peace_man | by joecrouse | 2006-09-08 10:37:46 |
|
Hard to find?! | by DesertRat66 | 2006-09-08 10:40:07 |
|
Took me 5 mins. wasnt really sure where to look | by joecrouse | 2006-09-08 10:42:49 |
|
So Officers actually DON'T swear to obey | by Tomo | 2006-09-08 12:31:11 |
|
I suppose technically | by MatthewDBA | 2006-09-08 12:35:04 |
|
yup, but tis implicit, not explicit: | by subbywan | 2006-09-08 12:36:12 |
|
Right Officers are paid to think about thier | by joecrouse | 2006-09-08 12:43:49 |
|
So if a platoon is told to blow up a village of | by talon0720 | 2006-09-08 10:33:25 |
|
That is very different | by DesertRat66 | 2006-09-08 10:38:17 |
|
Nope. | by subbywan | 2006-09-08 10:38:46 |
|
Very differant the Enlisted person | by joecrouse | 2006-09-08 10:41:12 |
|
In his(GWB) defence just for the sake of argument | by joecrouse | 2006-09-08 10:18:02 |
|
Got the mission wrong | by DesertRat66 | 2006-09-08 10:23:55 |