| A simpler version of yesterday's "What's a bird?" |
by BaruMonkey |
2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
(Reference)
Same question, different object: How do you define a "chair"? (note: I don't want the dictionary's definition, I want yours.) |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
feathered, 2 legs, wings, beak | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 07:34:46 |
|
doh. thats the bird def, obviously. (n/t) | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 07:35:17 |
|
*tries to sit on a bird* | by madjo | 2006-07-26 07:38:14 |
|
Same answer: what chair? There is no chair. (n/t) | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 07:35:01 |
|
object that is designed to be sat on | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 07:36:15 |
|
Woud that include ones gluteus? (n/t) | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 07:37:02 |
|
Not designed to be sat on... | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 07:40:06 |
|
O-kay, so how 'bout good ol' Terra Firma? (n/t) | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 07:42:17 |
|
Just because it CAN be sat upon does not mean it | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 07:50:21 |
|
Would that make a tire swing a chair? (n/t) | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 07:53:35 |
|
Yup. It meets the criterion. | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 08:06:33 |
|
*exerts considerable effort to remain FYOSS* | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 08:16:40 |
|
Actually, vice versa | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 08:19:21 |
|
That's what I'm saying | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 08:22:22 |
|
Only if its a swing you sit on/in. (n/t) | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 08:46:25 |
|
Nice dodge | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 08:53:11 |
|
*sigh* | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 09:01:22 |
|
So... | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 09:11:13 |
|
I wouldn't really call a beanbag chair | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 07:44:00 |
|
Well, you just did. *snicker* (n/t) | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 07:49:46 |
|
Okay, let me rephrase that: | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 07:52:00 |
|
Why not? | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 07:54:15 |
|
If a chair has no back | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 07:56:58 |
|
Huh? | by Havoc | 2006-07-26 08:08:51 |
|
I still don't think I'd call something | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 08:17:43 |
|
Toilets are not chairs. | by kahuana | 2006-07-26 07:59:12 |
|
Toilets are not designed for sitting | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 08:01:20 |
|
Tey most certainly are designed for sitting. | by kahuana | 2006-07-26 08:03:36 |
|
a chair is a sitting device | by madjo | 2006-07-26 07:37:00 |
|
Chair: | by Rogue1971 | 2006-07-26 07:37:21 |
|
Designed for one person | by Didactylos | 2006-07-26 07:39:37 |
|
Chair | by hyzenthlay | 2006-07-26 07:42:26 |
|
the angle thing is not a guarantee | by madjo | 2006-07-26 07:47:03 |
|
I don't think you can specify height - | by Didactylos | 2006-07-26 07:48:33 |
|
If it is too low | by hyzenthlay | 2006-07-26 07:51:25 |
|
What if | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 07:53:50 |
|
It is a child's chair | by hyzenthlay | 2006-07-26 07:57:14 |
|
They may be the only chairs I can find | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 07:59:44 |
|
Naw | by hyzenthlay | 2006-07-26 08:08:11 |
|
Any object which is both either a chair or a towel | by imperito | 2006-07-26 07:43:10 |
|
A chair is | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 07:43:19 |
|
ANYTHING | by daemon_poet | 2006-07-26 07:49:45 |
|
Is a stone a chair | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 07:50:39 |
|
Is a chair a chair | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 07:52:15 |
|
Yes. | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 07:54:12 |
|
Perception is the key | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 07:56:32 |
|
You can't say "how long is the chair a chair" | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 07:58:45 |
|
Sure I can; who says I actually have to make sense | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 08:03:12 |
|
Hmm, I think I see your point... | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 08:22:12 |
|
While you're chewing... | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 08:27:09 |
|
Hmm, not sure I agree | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 08:29:50 |
|
Where's the problem? | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 08:36:35 |
|
I still disagree | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 08:38:36 |
|
So there is an ideal chair? | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 08:41:09 |
|
There is an ideal chair. | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 08:42:42 |
|
Oh, how to attack that one? | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 08:51:53 |
|
Just because the mind of God | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 08:59:41 |
|
But if the ideal of a chair exists | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 09:08:36 |
|
I'm not clear here | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 09:15:20 |
|
It still all boils down to a chair only existing.. | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 09:49:05 |
|
re-phrase | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 10:02:06 |
|
Well, | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 10:03:40 |
|
Then what we are left with is... | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 10:45:22 |
|
If it is possible that you | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 11:04:08 |
|
O-kay, I understand "necessarily", in that context | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 11:52:26 |
|
Nice one | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 12:29:31 |
|
Trouble is.. | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 12:42:37 |
|
Almost anything. | by tallastro | 2006-07-26 08:17:44 |
|
So something can be a chair for one person | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 08:26:54 |
|
Yes. There are many such objects. (n/t) | by tallastro | 2006-07-26 08:28:52 |
|
So you would say | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 08:34:06 |
|
Yes, but with much commonality. | by tallastro | 2006-07-26 08:53:36 |
|
anything i call a chair is a chair for me | by Klymer | 2006-07-26 08:12:00 |
|
comfy chair!!!!!!!!!! | by Klymer | 2006-07-26 08:12:52 |
|
Another entity that has 4 legs and a back, and | by BaruMonkey | 2006-07-26 09:33:36 |
|
I think there's a difference between | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 09:36:32 |
|
So is the *breed* of horses a chair? (n/t) | by BaruMonkey | 2006-07-26 09:42:33 |
|
No; a breed is not an object. | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 09:45:17 |
|
So a collection of chairs, then? (n/t) | by BaruMonkey | 2006-07-26 09:46:41 |
|
No | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 09:50:15 |
|
Scientists have created a robot that can replicate | by BaruMonkey | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
The creation of the individual horses | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 10:22:23 |
|
The creation of the individual chairs | by BaruMonkey | 2006-07-26 10:26:55 |
|
I guess it depends | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 10:34:51 |
|
Doesn't fit my criteria. | by tallastro | 2006-07-26 10:03:53 |
|
depends (n/t) | by Len48 | 2006-07-26 10:17:07 |
|
Many in this thread would argue... | by bitflipper | 2006-07-26 10:49:08 |
|
Well, I suppose you could | by MatthewDBA | 2006-07-26 11:04:51 |
|
my goodness | by psychoi3oy | 2006-07-26 13:15:08 |