The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

For *constructive* debates sake on WMD's I am by Classic_Jon2006-11-19 12:55:59
  WMDs' Wikipedia link: by BaruMonkey2006-11-19 12:55:59
    In which it says... by Kickstart2006-06-22 12:19:32
      Further, the first definition is pointlessly vague by Kickstart2006-06-22 12:21:12
        You are now seeing what I thought was funny by Classic_Jon 2006-06-22 12:55:07
about the many definitions I was looking at :-D

I find this at the bottom of the page on the first link VERY humerous and *scary* at the same time... "[Editor's Note: A definition of WMD could not be found at either the United Nations or Merriam - Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition. 3/31/06]"

I find it INCREDIBLE that the U.N. does not have a definition of a WMD but they sure as heck have a lot to say about it...and torture too for that matter... I wonder if they have a definition for that too in the U.N. guidelines? Time to google and possibly start a new thread :)
[ Reply ]
          UN definition of torture... by Kickstart2006-11-19 12:55:59
            Now what's the UN's definition of severe? (n/t) by DesertRat662006-06-22 13:34:04
            Thanks :) Good reading! (n/t) by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 13:35:48

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)