UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

For constructive debates sake on WMD's I am	by Classic_Jon	2006-11-19 12:55:59
For everybody's convenience, here	by Peace_man	2006-11-19 12:55:59
Which is pretty clear on one point...	by Kickstart	2006-06-22 12:22:33
They are, however, proscribed weapons. (n/t)	by RetiQlum2	2006-06-22 12:24:21
Yup, no argument there.	by Kickstart	2006-06-22 12:29:06
Not the point is it?	by DesertRat66	2006-06-22 12:34:07
If there's one thing we've learned about his reign	by Kickstart	2006-06-22 12:39:36
is that he had extremely poor accounting of such things, and a lot of what he was told by his own advisors was untrue. As far as he knew, they may have all been destroyed. Once again I make the point that I believe Saddam deserved to be taken out. But the crap about Saddam being able to attack the US should not have been part of the rationale for attacking Iraq. And even if there WAS enough rationale to attack Iraq without those claims, the US has done a p4-poor job of it. KS
[ Reply ]
just for clarification...what was the p4-poor job?	by altordwm	2006-06-22 12:44:13
The ongoing occupation	by Kickstart	2006-06-22 12:48:21

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)