The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
For *constructive* debates sake on WMD's I am by Classic_Jon 2006-11-19 12:55:59
posting a couple of links to what a WMD is considered to be by several sources.

I am not saying anything for or against it, only listing definition links to assist in having a *constructive* discussion on it rather than an argument or lack of constructive debate/comments. This is not directed at any one person whatsoever but to assist in constructive discussion of the topic.

If anyone has some other *constructive* definition links to add please do so! :-D

several different views on one page
sourcewatch
reference-dot-com
Encyclopedia Britanica
[ Reply ]
  WMDs' Wikipedia link: by BaruMonkey2006-11-19 12:55:59
    In which it says... by Kickstart2006-06-22 12:19:32
      Further, the first definition is pointlessly vague by Kickstart2006-06-22 12:21:12
        You are now seeing what I thought was funny by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 12:55:07
          UN definition of torture... by Kickstart2006-11-19 12:55:59
            Now what's the UN's definition of severe? (n/t) by DesertRat662006-06-22 13:34:04
            Thanks :) Good reading! (n/t) by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 13:35:48
  uhm... by unjust2006-06-22 12:08:19
    You prove my point most admirably :) by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 12:13:09
      well yes, but what viv was attempting by unjust2006-06-22 12:52:12
        Well... Peace man added this to the discussion by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 13:01:13
          how many roads must a ...... (n/t) by unjust2006-06-22 13:31:47
            I am actually being serious. If you can find by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 14:17:10
        Let me ask you something by DesertRat662006-06-22 13:02:44
  For everybody's convenience, here by Peace_man2006-11-19 12:55:59
    Which is pretty clear on one point... by Kickstart2006-06-22 12:22:33
      They are, however, proscribed weapons. (n/t) by RetiQlum22006-06-22 12:24:21
        Yup, no argument there. by Kickstart2006-06-22 12:29:06
          Not the point is it? by DesertRat662006-06-22 12:34:07
            If there's one thing we've learned about his reign by Kickstart2006-06-22 12:39:36
              just for clarification...what was the p4-poor job? by altordwm2006-06-22 12:44:13
                The ongoing occupation by Kickstart2006-06-22 12:48:21
        So is a nail file. by Peace_man2006-06-22 12:29:51
          But the fact that is is illegal to have is the by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 12:51:09
    One more definition with examples by DesertRat662006-11-19 12:55:59
      If they were so ineffective, why the fear? (n/t) by Peace_man2006-06-22 13:11:24
        Not ineffective incompetent by DesertRat662006-06-22 13:18:14
          case in point, iraqi public services. (n/t) by unjust2006-06-22 13:19:30
            (sorry DR -way way- too easy.) (n/t) by unjust2006-06-22 13:22:00
              Would be nice if you'd let us know by DesertRat662006-06-22 13:29:56

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)