The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Defending Marriage by Illiad2006-11-19 12:55:59
  havent read the article by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:02:18
    Then you might want to read the article. by Illiad2006-06-22 09:03:00
      ok read it by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:22:43
        Anthropologically speaking... by Illiad2006-06-22 09:25:15
          not one that would be accepted by this board by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:26:59
            Destroy it how? by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 09:40:58
              Nobody mentioned gay marriage until you piped in by altordwm2006-06-22 09:44:55
                Okay then, by nix2006-06-22 09:47:54
                  constant redefinition by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:50:15
                    So people who are religious by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 09:52:09
                      I'm saying people by and large are stupid by tesla_koil2006-06-22 10:00:56
                        So what movement to destroy marriage by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:08:30
                          you know that maybe the best way to describe the by tesla_koil2006-06-22 10:24:50
                            How does someone else's definition by SoylentGreen 2006-06-22 10:53:10
of their marriage outside of a religious context, or within a different religious context from yours affect your ability to define your marriage within the religious context that you choose?

Up until the 1950s or so, the "American context" of marriage had always been one man and one woman of the same skin colour. This changed, and it didn't cause the demise of 'traditional marriage'.
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)