|
Defending Marriage | by Illiad | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
havent read the article | by tesla_koil | 2006-06-22 09:02:18 |
|
Then you might want to read the article. | by Illiad | 2006-06-22 09:03:00 |
|
ok read it | by tesla_koil | 2006-06-22 09:22:43 |
|
Anthropologically speaking... | by Illiad | 2006-06-22 09:25:15 |
|
not one that would be accepted by this board | by tesla_koil | 2006-06-22 09:26:59 |
|
Destroy it how? | by hyzenthlay | 2006-06-22 09:40:58 |
| bob + joe <> marriage |
by tesla_koil |
2006-06-22 09:48:05 |
| sorry.. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Not according... | by Illiad | 2006-06-22 09:49:39 |
|
in that group yes | by tesla_koil | 2006-06-22 09:51:16 |
|
Eh? | by Illiad | 2006-06-22 09:52:34 |
|
s'cuse me | by tesla_koil | 2006-06-22 09:55:59 |
|
I'm atheist. I'm married. | by vetitice | 2006-06-22 09:58:58 |
|
your belief is your athiesm | by tesla_koil | 2006-06-22 10:01:45 |
|
I am an agnostic, I am also married. (n/t) | by hyzenthlay | 2006-06-22 10:04:32 |
|
So, in your view, can agnostics (like me) "marry"? (n/t) | by BaruMonkey | 2006-06-22 10:04:46 |
|
you can marry, but you cannot convince | by shminux | 2006-06-22 10:06:58 |
|
you can be "married" | by tesla_koil | 2006-06-22 10:12:00 |
|
Understood. (n/t) | by BaruMonkey | 2006-06-22 10:13:31 |
|
So why did you say | by hyzenthlay | 2006-06-22 10:18:28 |
|
I would also like to know | by chrisP | 2006-06-22 10:20:23 |
|
Defining a traditional marriage: | by Miss L. Anyus | 2006-06-22 10:28:56 |
|
:-D | by chrisP | 2006-06-22 10:43:52 |
|
Speaking of which, | by Feng_Li | 2006-06-22 11:07:47 |
|
But I don't believe in atheism. :-p (n/t) | by vetitice | 2006-06-22 10:11:19 |
|
Then either you contradict yourself or | by BaruMonkey | 2006-06-22 10:12:54 |
|
Oh, yes.. I guess I'm strong agnostic. | by vetitice | 2006-06-22 10:17:55 |
|
I'm referring to just that. | by Illiad | 2006-06-22 10:01:21 |
|
but it flips back and forth | by tesla_koil | 2006-06-22 10:09:09 |
|
There is no objective truth, as far as social | by shminux | 2006-06-22 10:18:16 |
|
You are avoiding my question | by hyzenthlay | 2006-06-22 09:56:10 |
|
it wouldn't | by tesla_koil | 2006-06-22 10:18:51 |
|
The I ask why did you say | by hyzenthlay | 2006-06-22 10:24:08 |
|
Does anyone have to recognize your marriage? | by tallastro | 2006-06-22 10:39:00 |
|
Why have separate versions legally? | by BloodyViking | 2006-06-22 10:45:11 |
|
That didn't come out right. | by tallastro | 2006-06-22 10:53:09 |
|
They already Are separate. | by BloodyViking | 2006-06-22 11:32:07 |
|
But they use the Same word | by tallastro | 2006-06-22 12:13:51 |
|
+++Can+++ occur at the same ceremony. | by BloodyViking | 2006-06-22 12:39:46 |
|
And for many +++do+++ happen at the same time. | by tallastro | 2006-06-22 13:25:00 |
|
SPAM, SPAM, SPAM, SPAM, | by BloodyViking | 2006-06-22 14:43:42 |
|
Shut UP!! Bloody Vikings (n/t) | by tallastro | 2006-06-22 14:58:49 |