The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Defending Marriage by Illiad2006-11-19 12:55:59
  havent read the article by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:02:18
    Then you might want to read the article. by Illiad2006-06-22 09:03:00
      ok read it by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:22:43
        Anthropologically speaking... by Illiad2006-06-22 09:25:15
          not one that would be accepted by this board by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:26:59
            Destroy it how? by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 09:40:58
              Nobody mentioned gay marriage until you piped in by altordwm 2006-06-22 09:44:55
As the end of the article mentioned, he wasn't arguing about gay rights at all, but about the defense of a traditional marriage.
[ Reply ]
                Okay then, by nix2006-06-22 09:47:54
                  constant redefinition by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:50:15
                    So people who are religious by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 09:52:09
                      I'm saying people by and large are stupid by tesla_koil2006-06-22 10:00:56
                        So what movement to destroy marriage by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:08:30
                          you know that maybe the best way to describe the by tesla_koil2006-06-22 10:24:50
                            Only because the 'American' by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:38:06
                              "Christian," or "European"? by esbita2006-06-22 10:57:28
                                Religion or Culture by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 11:01:58
                                You can argue that then, but now? by esbita2006-06-22 11:06:57
                            How does someone else's definition by SoylentGreen2006-06-22 10:53:10
                        Not much better in some Catholic circles by esbita2006-06-22 10:09:25
                          You don't think it is? What are you hiding? by Miss L. Anyus2006-06-22 10:17:23
                            But the oppression would never happen! by esbita2006-06-22 10:20:59
                              I know it's wrong, but when I read 'shepherd and by Miss L. Anyus2006-06-22 10:25:34
                                UUUUUGGGH!!!! (n/t) by esbita2006-06-22 10:26:29
                          hehehe....n/t by pointlessshrew2006-06-22 15:29:59
                  It's the "if they can do it, so can I" argument. by merlin2006-06-22 09:51:57
                    I'm pretty sure that pre-marital sex has been happ by Concept2006-06-22 10:42:23
                That's why my second sentence by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 09:50:08
                  Thank you for missing the point the second time. ( (n/t) by altordwm2006-06-22 10:01:03
                    What point? by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:10:42
                  How about this: WHO defines marriage? by esbita2006-06-22 10:07:52
                    My point is by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:16:17
                      Agreed, to a point. by esbita2006-06-22 10:23:42
                        It was a quick example to get a grin :) by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:35:21
                          I would be all for more of a waiting period by esbita2006-06-22 10:46:53
                            You can please some people some of the time... by Miss L. Anyus2006-06-22 10:50:21
                              Oh yes, please please me! by Spiff2006-06-22 11:06:17
                        Breathalyzers. (n/t) by Pic2006-06-22 11:09:31
                          :-D by esbita2006-06-22 11:15:26
                    Just 60 years or so ago it was by Zyxian2006-06-22 12:47:31
                      Somebody already beat you to that point by esbita2006-06-22 12:57:33
                        I haven't read all the posts so I... by Zyxian2006-06-22 13:49:36

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)