The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Defending Marriage by Illiad2006-11-19 12:55:59
  havent read the article by tesla_koil 2006-06-22 09:02:18
but from the quote. lets all just screw indescrimantly and have abortions when birth control fails.
[ Reply ]
    Then you might want to read the article. by Illiad2006-06-22 09:03:00
      ok read it by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:22:43
        Anthropologically speaking... by Illiad2006-06-22 09:25:15
          not one that would be accepted by this board by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:26:59
            You're right. by Illiad2006-06-22 09:29:22
            Unified attempt by SoylentGreen2006-06-22 09:36:14
              i second that (n/t) by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:46:48
              A unified attempt from where, though? by hadji2006-06-22 10:55:32
                Ooohhh -- I like that... (n/t) by Zyxian2006-06-22 13:52:03
                  I don't. It saddens me. by hadji2006-06-22 14:41:07
                    while(posts_like_these) by vetitice2006-06-22 15:02:05
                    I meant I like the analogy. (n/t) by Zyxian2006-06-22 15:32:55
            Destroy it how? by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 09:40:58
              Nobody mentioned gay marriage until you piped in by altordwm2006-06-22 09:44:55
                Okay then, by nix2006-06-22 09:47:54
                  constant redefinition by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:50:15
                    So people who are religious by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 09:52:09
                      I'm saying people by and large are stupid by tesla_koil2006-06-22 10:00:56
                        So what movement to destroy marriage by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:08:30
                          you know that maybe the best way to describe the by tesla_koil2006-06-22 10:24:50
                            Only because the 'American' by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:38:06
                              "Christian," or "European"? by esbita2006-06-22 10:57:28
                                Religion or Culture by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 11:01:58
                                You can argue that then, but now? by esbita2006-06-22 11:06:57
                            How does someone else's definition by SoylentGreen2006-06-22 10:53:10
                        Not much better in some Catholic circles by esbita2006-06-22 10:09:25
                          You don't think it is? What are you hiding? by Miss L. Anyus2006-06-22 10:17:23
                            But the oppression would never happen! by esbita2006-06-22 10:20:59
                              I know it's wrong, but when I read 'shepherd and by Miss L. Anyus2006-06-22 10:25:34
                                UUUUUGGGH!!!! (n/t) by esbita2006-06-22 10:26:29
                          hehehe....n/t by pointlessshrew2006-06-22 15:29:59
                  It's the "if they can do it, so can I" argument. by merlin2006-06-22 09:51:57
                    I'm pretty sure that pre-marital sex has been happ by Concept2006-06-22 10:42:23
                That's why my second sentence by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 09:50:08
                  Thank you for missing the point the second time. ( (n/t) by altordwm2006-06-22 10:01:03
                    What point? by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:10:42
                  How about this: WHO defines marriage? by esbita2006-06-22 10:07:52
                    My point is by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:16:17
                      Agreed, to a point. by esbita2006-06-22 10:23:42
                        It was a quick example to get a grin :) by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:35:21
                          I would be all for more of a waiting period by esbita2006-06-22 10:46:53
                            You can please some people some of the time... by Miss L. Anyus2006-06-22 10:50:21
                              Oh yes, please please me! by Spiff2006-06-22 11:06:17
                        Breathalyzers. (n/t) by Pic2006-06-22 11:09:31
                          :-D by esbita2006-06-22 11:15:26
                    Just 60 years or so ago it was by Zyxian2006-06-22 12:47:31
                      Somebody already beat you to that point by esbita2006-06-22 12:57:33
                        I haven't read all the posts so I... by Zyxian2006-06-22 13:49:36
              bob + joe <> marriage by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:48:05
                Not according... by Illiad2006-06-22 09:49:39
                  in that group yes by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:51:16
                    Eh? by Illiad2006-06-22 09:52:34
                      s'cuse me by tesla_koil2006-06-22 09:55:59
                        I'm atheist. I'm married. by vetitice2006-06-22 09:58:58
                          your belief is your athiesm by tesla_koil2006-06-22 10:01:45
                            I am an agnostic, I am also married. (n/t) by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:04:32
                            So, in your view, can agnostics (like me) "marry"? (n/t) by BaruMonkey2006-06-22 10:04:46
                              you can marry, but you cannot convince by shminux2006-06-22 10:06:58
                                you can be "married" by tesla_koil2006-06-22 10:12:00
                                Understood. (n/t) by BaruMonkey2006-06-22 10:13:31
                                So why did you say by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:18:28
                                I would also like to know by chrisP2006-06-22 10:20:23
                                Defining a traditional marriage: by Miss L. Anyus2006-06-22 10:28:56
                                :-D by chrisP2006-06-22 10:43:52
                                Speaking of which, by Feng_Li2006-06-22 11:07:47
                            But I don't believe in atheism. :-p (n/t) by vetitice2006-06-22 10:11:19
                              Then either you contradict yourself or by BaruMonkey2006-06-22 10:12:54
                                Oh, yes.. I guess I'm strong agnostic. by vetitice2006-06-22 10:17:55
                        I'm referring to just that. by Illiad2006-06-22 10:01:21
                          but it flips back and forth by tesla_koil2006-06-22 10:09:09
                            There is no objective truth, as far as social by shminux2006-06-22 10:18:16
                You are avoiding my question by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 09:56:10
                  it wouldn't by tesla_koil2006-06-22 10:18:51
                    The I ask why did you say by hyzenthlay2006-06-22 10:24:08
                    Does anyone have to recognize your marriage? by tallastro2006-06-22 10:39:00
                      Why have separate versions legally? by BloodyViking2006-06-22 10:45:11
                        That didn't come out right. by tallastro2006-06-22 10:53:09
                          They already Are separate. by BloodyViking2006-06-22 11:32:07
                            But they use the Same word by tallastro2006-06-22 12:13:51
                              +++Can+++ occur at the same ceremony. by BloodyViking2006-06-22 12:39:46
                                And for many +++do+++ happen at the same time. by tallastro2006-06-22 13:25:00
                                SPAM, SPAM, SPAM, SPAM, by BloodyViking2006-06-22 14:43:42
                                Shut UP!! Bloody Vikings (n/t) by tallastro2006-06-22 14:58:49
            There are more traditions than just yours. by BloodyViking2006-06-22 10:30:01
              cause there more of us by tesla_koil2006-06-22 11:06:05
                Maybe in this country, but by BloodyViking2006-06-22 11:14:22
                  where do you find by tesla_koil2006-06-22 11:49:17
                    In the first amendment. (n/t) by hej2006-06-22 11:54:44

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)