The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Uh-oh. Hundreds of WMDs found in Iraq by VivianC2006-11-19 12:55:59
  uhm they weren't functional. by unjust 2006-06-22 08:34:03
" A Pentagon official who confirmed the findings said that all the weapons were pre-1991 vintage munitions "in such a degraded state they couldn't be used for what they are designed for."

no news there. they've been finding unstable munitions since it began, the claim was of a present threat. early 90's rotted stuff isn't. it's not -safe- no, but it's not a weapon (conventionally) anymore.

this has been known for a while.
[ Reply ]
    Well, early 1990's stuff was still there when the by NDwight2006-06-22 08:36:16
      Which does not support the conclusion... by CynicalRyan2006-06-22 08:41:49
        They were found. by VivianC2006-06-22 08:44:30
          no they were found, and the technology in tehm by unjust2006-06-22 08:45:16
            As I said. by CynicalRyan2006-06-22 08:55:33
              Not according to CNN by VivianC2006-11-19 12:55:59
                yup. by unjust2006-11-19 12:55:59
                  So did the bushies lie or were they just wrong? by DesertRat662006-06-22 10:27:45
                    my opinion: by unjust2006-06-22 10:31:52
                      Oh, I see by Jito4632006-06-22 10:41:56
                        Like I said: Option C (n/t) by DesertRat662006-06-22 11:02:21
                        Old intelligence by Didactylos2006-06-22 11:07:21
                          exactly. i'm not entirely convinced by unjust2006-06-22 11:27:23
                    Lied by vdp2006-11-19 12:55:59
                Yup. by wwill2006-11-19 12:55:59
                  Hmmm... by VivianC2006-06-22 09:15:33
                    check my link viv. yeah it's wikipedia by unjust2006-06-22 09:17:02
                    The "senior" group all has a vested interest in it by wwill2006-06-22 09:19:24
        i thought they found one and determined that by unjust2006-06-22 08:44:46
      no, because they have been destroyed. by zoxer2006-06-22 09:00:40
    Not functional, but still deadly by VivianC2006-06-22 08:40:59
      and the us army can put it's finger on every by unjust2006-06-22 08:46:14
        I surely hope *not*! :-) by kahuana2006-06-22 09:36:29
        Are we talking about the US Army or Iraq? (n/t) by DesertRat662006-06-22 09:36:44
          i was using the us as an example by unjust2006-06-22 09:38:36
            With a leader you really want to keep happy by Spiff2006-06-22 09:51:39
            500+? Not bloody likely by DesertRat662006-11-19 12:55:59
              no new info there for me by unjust2006-06-22 10:02:58
                So you just refuse to accept the facts then? by DesertRat662006-06-22 10:18:40
                  not ignoring anything by unjust2006-06-22 10:24:44
                    Yes you are by DesertRat662006-11-19 12:55:59
                      Attack of the killer yeast! by Didactylos2006-06-22 11:05:13
                        I do hope for your sake et al. includes by DesertRat662006-06-22 11:24:09
                          absence of something does not make something by unjust2006-06-22 11:29:53
                            And you will ignore anything that is found by DesertRat662006-06-22 11:37:00
                              no i'm not denying that he had bits and pieces by unjust2006-06-22 11:48:48
      Only deadly in the same way as a normal shell by wwill2006-06-22 08:59:38
        For the sake of discussion only, So under that by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 10:16:17
          not inert no. good greaif that's a ecipie for by unjust2006-06-22 10:27:35
            But that proves my point exactly :) by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 10:41:38
              sort of. by unjust2006-06-22 11:38:26
                To go along with your line of reasoning by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 12:05:54
                  i think you're looking for any excuse now by unjust2006-06-22 12:15:33
                    You misread my intent. I never said stockpile by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 12:48:05
                      that's fair by unjust2006-06-22 12:54:28
                        I will agree the proof he knew is sticky...esp by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 13:05:52
                Conventional weapons are easy by DesertRat662006-06-22 12:32:50
                  yes, but how were those ordnances stored? by unjust2006-06-22 12:56:19
                    They are still not letting people in some bunkers by Classic_Jon2006-06-22 13:04:14
                      which we both agree on by unjust2006-06-22 13:17:12
                    Not sure but I know how Iraqi weapons were by DesertRat662006-11-19 12:55:59
                    These WWI bombs/shells etc. still explode. by Sharku2006-06-22 13:57:14
                      exactly. theyr'e dangerou, but no by unjust2006-06-22 14:02:03
                        Still a long ways from... by Sharku2006-06-22 15:05:23

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)