UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Visitation taken away so "child can get...	by Kickstart	2006-11-19 12:55:59
Er...if religion is such an issue...	by esbita	2006-03-24 16:48:39
I can respect a parent's wish to keep	by hadji	2006-03-24 17:01:45
consistency as well. But that's not a judicial issue. The only reason I can see that something like this would be valid would be if an atheist was immoral or amoral, and as such lacking in will or ability to teach the child right from wrong. But that doesn't appear to have been the issue here. And that's the crime. As many of you know, I'm not a fan of abortion. And I wasn't thrilled about prayer (even silent prayer and moments of silence) and such being banned from schools. But that's because I support equal rights. Maybe I support them in a different way that others do, but I still support them. That includes the rights of unborn children and the rights of students in schools to express themselves as they wish. I know there are a lot of other issues and gotchas with those to examples, but my point here is to briefly explain myself. In this case, there were no equal rights. The father was never shown to be a bad parent. The judge is obviously biased and should be disrobed.
[ Reply ]
equal rights have nothing to do with it.	by subbywan	2006-03-24 17:05:33
I see no mention of welfare of the child.	by jiteo	2006-03-24 17:12:57
There isn't any mention of it.	by subbywan	2006-03-24 17:16:43
Quote from the article:	by SouthpawPL	2006-03-24 17:22:49
I did mention that the father was	by hadji	2006-03-24 17:14:20

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)