The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

anybody seen firefoxmyths.com? by Gargravarr2006-11-19 12:55:59
  I have to laugh at the claim by fudje2006-03-24 03:59:27
    While I agree by Didactylos 2006-03-24 04:32:09
that the claim is ridiculous (talk about numbers plucked from the air!) IE -does- render normal pages correctly without any fuss.

The HTML standard is fairly loose anyway, so a bit a variance between browsers is permissible. Valid HTML or XHTML will render most acceptably. I am at a loss to think of a single example where IE will unequivocally fail (I'm sure there is, though).

The CSS support is more flaky. But this is true of Firefox, too (although in different ways). There are times when the CSS standard itself doesn't make any sense. Sometimes it's ambiguous. So, the browsers just do what they want, extend it, ignore some bits, and so on. The irony is, Firefox is just as guilty of extending standards as IE is.

If you restrict yourself to the subset of CSS suported fully by all browsers, then, again, you will be very unlucky to experience any problems at all.
[ Reply ]
      I did say "that wasn't feature devoid" by fudje2006-03-24 17:16:50

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)