UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

More U.S. women getting 'revirgination' surgery	by DesertRat66	2006-11-19 12:55:59
On the topic of WTF and genitalia...	by toxin	2006-11-19 12:55:59
Personally...	by McNutcase	2005-12-19 09:18:08
Agreed.	by toxin	2005-12-19 09:34:12
i thought it still reduced risk of hiv? (n/t)	by unjust	2005-12-19 10:09:46
What?! No, of bloody course it doesn't.	by Esteis	2005-12-19 11:02:46
a study a few years back. it was an incidental	by unjust	2005-12-19 11:32:40
A quick google gives a whole bunch...	by Spiff	2005-12-19 12:03:40
I found	by chrisP	2006-11-19 12:55:59
Ditto on that.	by Feng_Li	2005-12-19 12:48:45
The thing is, that normally,	by chrisP	2005-12-19 13:01:53
there is no instant medical need or benefit to it. That the foreskin isn't retractable is normal for small boys (up to ~3 or 4 years) and no sign of phimosis. The main pro is that circumcision reduces penile germs. I used to work on an urological unit for more than two years, and personal hygiene ... well, you don't want to know :P Since hygiene reduces germs, too, there obviously is more than one option, hence a matter of choice (non exclusive, of course).
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)