UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Attn: VivianC	by Ravenlock	2006-11-19 12:55:59
I believe I answered that...	by esbita	2006-11-19 12:55:59
sort of.	by unjust	2005-10-06 09:34:19
But Uncle Sam wouldn't be distributing the soup...	by esbita	2005-10-06 09:48:00
so here is the question:	by unjust	2005-10-06 09:59:47
It's so they can do more.	by esbita	2005-10-06 10:45:56
no. you entirely missed my point	by unjust	2005-10-06 13:39:09
The legality has already been covered before.	by esbita	2005-10-06 13:46:16
you still miss my point.	by unjust	2005-10-06 14:14:43
The main focus of the article I posted...	by esbita	2005-10-06 14:22:29
no, personally i think afirmative action	by unjust	2005-10-06 14:38:58
You've been taking an absolutist position...	by esbita	2005-10-06 14:47:09
you misconstrue my point	by unjust	2005-10-06 15:06:50
afirmative action is not a moral policy, however it is a policy designed to prevent immoral actions that are/were indemic in some circles/fields. i did not say that it was a moral policy (or if i did i was confuddled) incidentally being discriminatory about funding discriminatory orginizations is inhereently discriminitory so the whole thing gets a bit moot if you put it into such blindly absolute terms. i did not say no discrimination no matter what no matter where. imho if a person only want's to hire purple monkeys to do something that's fine, but they should not be allowed gvt contracts to do that service if the gvt prohibits discriminating against blue monkeys in it's own policies. that make sence? as soon as the gvt allows something by association it allows it for itself.
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)