UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Attn: VivianC	by Ravenlock	2006-11-19 12:55:59
I believe I answered that...	by esbita	2006-11-19 12:55:59
sort of.	by unjust	2005-10-06 09:34:19
But Uncle Sam wouldn't be distributing the soup...	by esbita	2005-10-06 09:48:00
A point of agreement:	by BloodyViking	2005-10-06 10:35:21
Yes, but consider what the current laws say.	by esbita	2005-10-06 10:49:11
True. It doesn't mean the judge was right	by BloodyViking	2005-10-06 10:56:31
Just heading off at the pass.	by esbita	2005-10-06 11:00:47
actually	by unjust	2005-10-06 14:21:58
Internal functions?	by esbita	2005-10-06 14:25:44
you're confusing my arguments	by unjust	2005-10-06 14:41:51
and confusing professionalism with action. hiring a body to do a job is a professional decision. i.e. sweeping != inherently religious unless youre' zen buddhist. federal $$ being spent on non religious internal functions should not be spent in a discriminatory manner. the -calling- of the org is religious, but if the actions are being done commercially, i.e. paid for, then they are commercial and not religious. i'm arguing straight, you're missing the interconnect.
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)