UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Attn: VivianC	by Ravenlock	2006-11-19 12:55:59
I believe I answered that...	by esbita	2006-11-19 12:55:59
Not a cop out, a recognition of boundaries.	by BloodyViking	2005-10-06 10:31:44
There's no "partially equal opportunity" though.	by esbita	2005-10-06 11:19:44
Open religiously-affiliated charities to EEOC requirements, and it's not going to stop at who is staffing the disaster shelter. The requirements will go all the way up the command chain, rendering the religious affiliation moot. Likewise, it would open the smaller church-run shelters to lawsuits as to why only priests and nuns HAPPEN to run their charities- assuming the Federal funds ARE going to supplies/capacity rather than staffing. So, err on the side of letting the charity choose, and the charity receiving flak for its decision.
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)