|
Attn: VivianC | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| Close Enough |
by VivianC |
2005-10-06 09:58:54 |
While it is not the exact situation, this will show what happens. This clinic is owned and operated by Planned Parenthood.
In December 2001, Will Goodman delivered a letter to abortionist Dennis Christensen and his staff at the Madison Abortion Clinic. The letter was not threatening in the least. Instead, it affirmed the dignity of their lives as well as the lives of the unborn babies in the womb and their mothers. He believed that there were women present at the abortion clinic who were under duress and had not given their voluntary and informed consent to have an abortion.
As he was leaving the office, Goodman quietly handed out information on crisis pregnancy resources to women in the waiting room. Then a member of the abortuary staff tackled him and held him in a headlock. He got to his knees and began to pray, and a security officer pulled him to the ground and forcefully placed him in handcuffs.
He was eventually awarded damages in the case. Now, do you think it was for his beliefs or is this how they treat all potential tresspassers? Notice he wasn't even asked to leave.
So again I say, try it for yourself. Pretend to be a pro-lifer and walk into an abortion clinic. Let me know the results. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I think he was well deserving of the damages... | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
There was wrong-doing on both sides. | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 10:45:07 |
|
They should have called the police immediately. | by Havoc | 2005-10-06 10:49:53 |
|
Fair 'nuf. | by Ravenlock | 2005-10-06 12:46:56 |
|
More arguing at the extremes. | by esbita | 2005-10-06 11:51:30 |
|
You have a good point there. | by Ravenlock | 2005-10-06 13:04:09 |
|
Nor did I mean it to. | by esbita | 2005-10-06 13:08:00 |
|
invalid argument | by unjust | 2005-10-06 13:16:10 |
|
Bull pucky, invalid argument. | by esbita | 2005-10-06 13:23:42 |
|
no it is invalid in this case | by unjust | 2005-10-06 13:45:36 |
|
Gag me with a spoon. | by esbita | 2005-10-06 13:57:03 |
|
still doesn't make it vaild in reguard to the | by unjust | 2005-10-06 14:10:13 |
|
Now I wonder | by bara | 2005-10-06 13:59:40 |
|
Did any ever apply? | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 14:11:36 |
|
While lip service is given to counseling... | by esbita | 2005-10-06 14:15:50 |
|
Do you know that for a fact, | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 14:18:54 |
|
Anecdotal, sadly. | by esbita | 2005-10-06 14:28:18 |
|
Having been told By Who exactly? (n/t) | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 14:36:00 |
|
Pro-abortion orgs. | by esbita | 2005-10-06 14:40:02 |
|
You mean like for | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 15:08:35 |
|
Gah. | by esbita | 2005-10-06 15:18:51 |
|
I hope you noticed the smiley. | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 15:21:58 |
|
Yeah, it's a sensitive point, though. | by esbita | 2005-10-06 15:25:46 |
|
most recent reply so i'm saying ta ta here | by unjust | 2005-10-06 15:21:59 |
|
Not close enough. | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 10:15:52 |
|
unrelated. please discuss the topic at hand. | by unjust | 2005-10-06 10:27:23 |
|
Or that he asked for a job application. | by mortaine | 2005-10-06 10:48:05 |
|
I have no idea of the parameters anymore | by VivianC | 2005-10-06 11:28:39 |
|
Well, you clearly have some idea... | by Ravenlock | 2005-10-06 12:56:36 |
|
I really more for freedom of association. | by VivianC | 2005-10-06 14:46:03 |
|
Now, that's just snarky. | by Ravenlock | 2005-10-06 15:17:48 |
|
Wrong. | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 13:05:44 |
|
You have to acknowledge, though... | by esbita | 2005-10-06 13:11:17 |
|
nor any repuatable news agency | by unjust | 2005-10-06 13:20:38 |
|
Internal HR decision, huh? | by esbita | 2005-10-06 13:27:07 |
|
policy != decision on one person. | by unjust | 2005-10-06 13:50:20 |
|
So if they do that to 100 pro-lifers it would be | by bara | 2005-10-06 14:23:08 |
|
they don't that has been shown | by unjust | 2005-10-06 14:30:20 |
|
Trolling? | by bara | 2005-10-06 14:53:13 |
|
No. Making it policy makes it policy. | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 14:31:46 |
|
Under that assumption | by bara | 2005-10-06 14:46:33 |
|
no. | by unjust | 2005-10-06 14:51:45 |
|
Way to avoid the subject at hand | by bara | 2005-10-06 14:57:30 |
|
??? what kind of crack???? | by unjust | 2005-10-06 15:01:56 |
|
No. The policy is the policy. The Behavior | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 15:06:25 |
|
That kind of depends on | by BloodyViking | 2005-10-06 13:39:21 |
|
Is "abortuary" even a word? | by OsteSpiser | 2005-10-06 10:28:32 |
|
doesn't matter, viv didn't even acknowledge the | by unjust | 2005-10-06 10:33:12 |
