|
|
Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
|
<Deleted> | <Deleted> | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
But OpenOffice is so bad... | by shminux | 2005-10-04 09:43:51 |
|
What's so bad about OpenOffice? | by hadji | 2005-10-04 09:47:15 |
|
The fact that it's slow, bloated, | by LionsPhil | 2005-10-04 09:51:46 |
|
Odd. That's never happened to me. | by MatthewDBA | 2005-10-04 09:52:53 |
| Latest stable 1.x. |
by LionsPhil |
2005-10-04 10:00:53 |
Since 1.0 was such. Tried both built-from-source (which takes about two days straight on moderate hardware, and should indicate quite clearly just how much of a fat bastidge of a product it is) and the prebuilt binaries. Platforms include Windows 98SE (no, I'm not griping about the stability on *that* OS, because *98SE* can't stay up a weekend without randomly falling onto sharp objects), Windows XP, and Linux (under which it has fallen over without touching on several occasions -- the weekend one being on a machine with a two month uptime when I finally had to return it to be lobotomized (sniff)).
Contrary to popular belief, I don't for negative opinions of things out of pure ignorance. I've *used* OO.o and, frankly, my informed opinion is that it sucks. The one thing it has going for it is that I can open frickin' Word documents that morons send to me as the content of e-mails (which, natch, contain nothing but plain, 12pt Times New Roman text) without having to have the Real Deal (which I don't hold in much higher regard).
Lotus Smartsuite has to be the only office suite I've ever used which *wasn't* a bloated mess, and even them I'm being generous. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
|
[Todays Cartoon Discussion]
[News Index]
|
|
