The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Ok, who here studies Platonic solids? by eric3_141592005-10-04 08:57:58
  Consider the faces by MatthewDBA 2005-10-04 09:08:55
A dodecahedron, landing on one face, has 5 possible directions that are "easy" to go (the edges of that face). It's possible, of course, for it to bounce in any direction, but the minimum bounce height (and therefore probability of bouncing in a given direction) is least when it's bouncing toward the center of a given edge. So it's very easy for it to bounce in any of 5 different directions, and not much harder to bounce in any other direction (because the distance between the center of the face and a vertex is not much greater than the distance from center of face to center of an edge.

An icosahedron, on the other hand, can only roll "easily" in one of three directions. So it's less likely to be able to bounce off the table, move in one direction, bounce again in another direction, etc. This means it will come to rest more quickly.

Am I making sense or just rambling?
[ Reply ]
    Yes, that does make sense. by eric3_141592005-10-04 09:20:04
      But it's not guaranteed to be the right answer! by Mad Marty2005-10-04 09:58:40

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)