|
LA Blackout | by VivianC | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
A non-biased question | by Kickstart | 2005-09-12 13:41:03 |
|
Can't give a non-biased answer. | by VivianC | 2005-09-12 13:59:00 |
|
What's needed is a *new* energy producer. | by kahuana | 2005-09-12 14:04:39 |
| The cost of entry is very high. |
by VivianC |
2005-09-12 14:07:55 |
I can't think of how someone could go about building a couple reactors and getting onto the grid. Got any ideas around that?
Since we are max capacity now, I don't see the unit price suffering too badly if there was more supply. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Uh, why reactors? | by mortaine | 2005-09-12 14:12:51 |
|
Plus, reactor fuel has doubled in cost | by Arachnid | 2005-09-12 14:16:44 |
|
It earned itself back over 10 years. | by Esteis | 2005-09-12 14:20:31 |
|
Reactors ARE safe, cheap and environmentally sound | by RetiQlum2 | 2005-09-12 14:17:01 |
|
Storage isn't a problem. In 40-50 years | by kahuana | 2005-09-12 14:18:22 |
|
Chernobyl, Three Mile Island | by Arachnid | 2005-09-12 14:19:38 |
|
Chernobyl and Three Mile Island | by Pic | 2005-09-12 14:21:50 |
|
There's no real way of telling that | by Arachnid | 2005-09-12 14:23:15 |
|
Chernobyl was human error. | by kahuana | 2005-09-12 14:26:17 |
|
They did? I'd say "Darwin Award", but unfortunatel | by Esteis | 2005-09-12 14:27:45 |
|
Not entirely | by Arachnid | 2005-09-12 14:30:02 |
|
RetiQlum2's found links regarding Chernobyl. | by kahuana | 2005-09-12 14:34:36 |
|
See here | by Arachnid | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Chernobyl failed because... | by RetiQlum2 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Not really, | by run.dll | 2005-09-12 18:00:16 |
|
Windscale... | by LionsPhil | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Huh, I'd never heard of that one. | by Arachnid | 2005-09-12 15:04:06 |
|
It since got renamed to Sellafield. | by LionsPhil | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Or | by LionsPhil | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
TMI was a non-event | by run.dll | 2005-09-12 18:05:35 |
|
NIMBY applies to wind power, too. | by esbita | 2005-09-12 14:19:46 |
|
Solar? | by VivianC | 2005-09-12 14:25:28 |
|
Up here of course there's no way. | by esbita | 2005-09-12 14:38:58 |
|
Solar B&B | by VivianC | 2005-09-12 15:02:41 |
|
Every power source has its drawbacks | by DevinUll | 2005-09-12 14:55:19 |
|
Hydro dams. | by Arachnid | 2005-09-12 14:56:51 |
|
Drawback | by VivianC | 2005-09-12 15:04:26 |
|
That's true, however | by Arachnid | 2005-09-12 15:07:14 |
|
well, ecept for the clyde village anyway | by astro-g | 2005-09-12 19:19:58 |
|
James Bay hydroelectric project in Quebec | by kahuana | 2005-09-12 15:10:16 |
|
Just ask the residents of the Grand Canyon | by altordwm | 2005-09-12 15:06:27 |
|
Cost, Build time, Worker deaths, breaches, | by DevinUll | 2005-09-12 15:08:08 |
|
Beleive me, the random ground shaking here is | by astro-g | 2005-09-12 19:21:58 |
|
They cause the destruction of the river ecology. | by RetiQlum2 | 2005-09-12 16:35:32 |
|
Entry cost is prohibitively high. | by kahuana | 2005-09-12 14:14:26 |
|
The UF Power Plant | by VivianC | 2005-09-12 14:21:40 |
|
If your *cooling towers* are glowing, | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-12 15:28:17 |
|
Let me guess... | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-12 15:28:52 |
|
Oh no, quite the opposite. ;) (n/t) | by kahuana | 2005-09-12 16:15:06 |
