|
Who is controlling the mercenaries in NOLA? | by Kickstart | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
really??? | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 10:31:37 |
|
Don't be an ass. | by Kickstart | 2005-09-11 10:35:03 |
|
yeah that's right | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 10:37:42 |
|
Oy. Look. | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 10:41:14 |
|
proffesional killers? | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 10:45:31 |
|
*BZZZZZZZZT* incorrect! thank you for playing, ple | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 10:48:13 |
|
It's a biased article | by DesertRat66 | 2005-09-11 10:51:10 |
|
"USED TO OPERATING WITHOUT FEAR OF LEGAL REPERCUSS | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 10:52:20 |
|
Your point? | by DesertRat66 | 2005-09-11 10:54:45 |
|
I would very much like to see a link with | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 10:58:17 |
|
that's your entire problem | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:00:17 |
|
Not everyone is going to be a soldier | by Kickstart | 2005-09-11 11:01:32 |
|
sure | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:09:12 |
|
Forgive the cynicism, but you realize that you're | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 11:13:59 |
| not exactly |
by ducimus |
2005-09-11 11:22:35 |
There's nothing hard-edged about me, I'm more or less centrist. I lean to the right when it comes to responsibility and to the left when it comes to freedom. Example: give blackwater the contract and let them do their jobs. Those who behave inappropriately get the normal ammount of punishment plus X ammount of years in jail for abusing the power given to them. Give them the freedom to operate and show them some trust. If they fail in their responsibility, hammer 'em.
As for the "help" bit, I can't help you. If you can't tell that the article is biased and clueless, it's due to lack of experience. I can't offer articles that tell a more balanced story because these companies rarely get written about, and when they do the info is usualy incorrect. I wish I could do better than saying "here is my experience, it's better than what you're reading", but I can't.
Although if you wish you can go to any military forum and ask about them. If simple numbers will convince you, then you should have no problem getting confirmation there. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
pretend for a second that I'm a civilian and a | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 11:25:19 |
|
ok | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:31:02 |
|
danke. | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 11:32:41 |
|
You're right-wing. | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 11:36:32 |
|
pst, I'm a Canadian ya weirdo | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:49:21 |
|
All in favor of building ships with which | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 11:52:11 |
|
AYE! (n/t) | by diorama | 2005-09-11 11:53:56 |
|
Ha! | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-11 11:54:21 |
|
Nah - we gots tacnukes on board for "defensive" | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 12:02:12 |
|
Yeah, good luck with building it then. | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-11 12:05:35 |
|
OH NOES | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:07:52 |
|
*flashback to FF2* | by bwkaz | 2005-09-11 12:10:35 |
|
Nukes is probably the easy part | by hej | 2005-09-11 12:38:31 |
|
Defensive, feh. | by McNutcase | 2005-09-11 14:28:15 |
|
better hire Blackwater to do security :) | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:57:44 |
|
Preferrably having several "mercenary" firms | by hej | 2005-09-11 12:33:23 |
|
I'm not in university. | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 11:59:46 |
|
hypocrite | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:15:46 |
|
Why am I a hypocrite? | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:17:10 |
|
because | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:25:07 |
|
Okay start naming 12 years of failure | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:26:29 |
|
sure | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:32:48 |
|
Let's see | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:35:57 |
|
so your theory is... | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:53:38 |
|
Quebec we're trying to keep with us.. | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:56:45 |
|
"it needed the help"? | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 15:23:55 |
|
I bitch about the tax situation as much as anyone | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 13:03:01 |
|
BIG problem | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 13:06:38 |
|
what? | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 13:11:44 |
|
I doubt that. | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-11 13:57:07 |
|
Those are just policies... | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:36:20 |
|
no no follow the logic | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:39:58 |
|
I guess... | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:45:26 |
|
Actually, I'm not on that bandwagon. | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:27:43 |
|
thanks :p | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:30:04 |
|
femenism isn't worth fighting for? | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:31:37 |
|
feminism isn't worth fighting for | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:34:23 |
|
what? | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:38:18 |
|
I think socialism isn't worth fighting for | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:44:55 |
|
I'm not even going to try explaining it to you... | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:42:26 |
|
Something comparable? | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-11 13:54:27 |
|
Actually, yes. | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 14:20:55 |
|
Fair enough. | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-11 14:28:33 |
|
well, I'd LOVE to know more | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 15:36:46 |
|
Hang on a sec, | by wheresthefish | 2005-09-11 12:18:17 |
|
no, I shouted MODS because of a 3 letter word | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:23:21 |
|
Why are we even talking about Chretien? | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:19:43 |
|
yes, but he's not gone because of us | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:21:54 |
|
Gee...do you think...maybe...just maybe... | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:23:15 |
|
Minority Liberal, for starters | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:24:08 |
|
what?? | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:28:14 |
|
um yes you did | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:30:05 |
|
you having fun picking up on the parts which are | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:36:44 |
|
If they're irrelevent, why do you say them? (n/t) | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:40:43 |
|
Just becuase the rest of the country disagrees | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:17:39 |