|
Who is controlling the mercenaries in NOLA? | by Kickstart | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
really??? | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 10:31:37 |
|
Don't be an ass. | by Kickstart | 2005-09-11 10:35:03 |
|
yeah that's right | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 10:37:42 |
|
Oy. Look. | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 10:41:14 |
|
proffesional killers? | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 10:45:31 |
|
*BZZZZZZZZT* incorrect! thank you for playing, ple | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 10:48:13 |
| It's a biased article |
by DesertRat66 |
2005-09-11 10:51:10 |
Blackwater's primary mission is VIP protection and Guess what? They're all former Special Operations troops, so they learned to be professional killers where? Why the U.S. Armed forces. They also can face legal repercussions when they screw up an op.
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
"USED TO OPERATING WITHOUT FEAR OF LEGAL REPERCUSS | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 10:52:20 |
|
Your point? | by DesertRat66 | 2005-09-11 10:54:45 |
|
In your opinion... | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 10:57:38 |
|
I'm not worried about Blackwater | by DesertRat66 | 2005-09-11 12:17:43 |
|
I would very much like to see a link with | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 10:58:17 |
|
that's your entire problem | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:00:17 |
|
Not everyone is going to be a soldier | by Kickstart | 2005-09-11 11:01:32 |
|
sure | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:09:12 |
|
Forgive the cynicism, but you realize that you're | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 11:13:59 |
|
not exactly | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:22:35 |
|
pretend for a second that I'm a civilian and a | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 11:25:19 |
|
ok | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:31:02 |
|
danke. | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 11:32:41 |
|
You're right-wing. | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 11:36:32 |
|
pst, I'm a Canadian ya weirdo | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:49:21 |
|
All in favor of building ships with which | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 11:52:11 |
|
AYE! (n/t) | by diorama | 2005-09-11 11:53:56 |
|
Ha! | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-11 11:54:21 |
|
Nah - we gots tacnukes on board for "defensive" | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 12:02:12 |
|
Yeah, good luck with building it then. | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-11 12:05:35 |
|
OH NOES | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:07:52 |
|
*flashback to FF2* | by bwkaz | 2005-09-11 12:10:35 |
|
Nukes is probably the easy part | by hej | 2005-09-11 12:38:31 |
|
Defensive, feh. | by McNutcase | 2005-09-11 14:28:15 |
|
better hire Blackwater to do security :) | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 11:57:44 |
|
Preferrably having several "mercenary" firms | by hej | 2005-09-11 12:33:23 |
|
I'm not in university. | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 11:59:46 |
|
hypocrite | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:15:46 |
|
Why am I a hypocrite? | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:17:10 |
|
because | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:25:07 |
|
Okay start naming 12 years of failure | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:26:29 |
|
sure | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:32:48 |
|
Let's see | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:35:57 |
|
so your theory is... | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:53:38 |
|
Quebec we're trying to keep with us.. | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:56:45 |
|
"it needed the help"? | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 15:23:55 |
|
I bitch about the tax situation as much as anyone | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 13:03:01 |
|
BIG problem | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 13:06:38 |
|
what? | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 13:11:44 |
|
I doubt that. | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-11 13:57:07 |
|
Those are just policies... | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:36:20 |
|
no no follow the logic | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:39:58 |
|
I guess... | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:45:26 |
|
Actually, I'm not on that bandwagon. | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:27:43 |
|
thanks :p | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:30:04 |
|
femenism isn't worth fighting for? | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:31:37 |
|
feminism isn't worth fighting for | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:34:23 |
|
what? | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:38:18 |
|
I think socialism isn't worth fighting for | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:44:55 |
|
I'm not even going to try explaining it to you... | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:42:26 |
|
Something comparable? | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-11 13:54:27 |
|
Actually, yes. | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 14:20:55 |
|
Fair enough. | by LionsPhil | 2005-09-11 14:28:33 |
|
well, I'd LOVE to know more | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 15:36:46 |
|
Hang on a sec, | by wheresthefish | 2005-09-11 12:18:17 |
|
no, I shouted MODS because of a 3 letter word | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:23:21 |
|
Why are we even talking about Chretien? | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:19:43 |
|
yes, but he's not gone because of us | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:21:54 |
|
Gee...do you think...maybe...just maybe... | by Arivia | 2005-09-11 12:23:15 |
|
Minority Liberal, for starters | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:24:08 |
|
what?? | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:28:14 |
|
um yes you did | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:30:05 |
|
you having fun picking up on the parts which are | by ducimus | 2005-09-11 12:36:44 |
|
If they're irrelevent, why do you say them? (n/t) | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:40:43 |
|
Just becuase the rest of the country disagrees | by MikeCDN | 2005-09-11 12:17:39 |
|
Sorry, where did I claim to be a combat specialist | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 11:03:55 |
|
Maybe you should try the other side of the story: | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
pardon the barbedness of this reply, | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 12:03:39 |
|
Because it's not what you asked for | by DesertRat66 | 2005-09-11 12:07:34 |
|
yeah, but as we have demonstrated, | by cybergeek | 2005-09-11 12:32:57 |
|
Trouble is | by DesertRat66 | 2005-09-11 12:44:33 |
|
Finding articles not related to Iraq | by ManiacJoe | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
*acknowledged and agreed* (n/t) | by Bastetsmuse | 2005-09-11 10:57:29 |