The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
So much for freedom of speech by Kickstart2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Um...is there a slightly less biased source by thread_killer2005-08-16 07:22:11
    Why certianly by DesertRat662006-11-19 12:55:59
      I wholly disagree, and more. by Kickstart2005-08-16 08:58:16
        No one is abridging her rights by DesertRat662005-08-16 09:11:31
          Way to bypass the point of my post. by Kickstart 2005-08-16 09:17:37
Again: There ARE people who are quite willing to abridge her right to peaceful protest, and even those who are willing to vandalize property or endanger the well-bring of others to get their way.

I don't give a rat's behind if the people in Crawford are sick of the theatrics. That's their choice, just as it is Sheehan's for protesting. That's exactly the freedom that matters...having an opinion and expressing it.

On your last statement, if the U.S. is to survive as a bastion of honour, freedom, and human rights, then the wacky side of the political right needs to be kept away from power -just as much- as the radical loony left. What's currently happening is precisely not that.

KS
[ Reply ]
            How is it their choice? by JPaganel2005-08-16 09:25:18
            There are? by DesertRat662005-08-16 09:25:38
              Protesting the protestors does not include by Kickstart2005-08-16 09:30:41
                What is he under arrest for exactly? by hyzenthlay2005-08-16 10:00:12
                  Criminal Mischief by DesertRat662006-11-19 12:55:59
                    Uh...he attached a pipe to his truck by Kickstart2005-08-16 10:07:55
                      I see no mention of a pipe by DesertRat662005-08-16 10:12:13
                        Not welded to the front by Kickstart2006-11-19 12:55:59
                      Take a look at this. These are normal in that by classic_jon2005-08-16 10:26:52
                        Take a look at my other post on this by Kickstart2005-08-16 10:29:11
                          I saw the other post after this and responded to by classic_jon2005-08-16 11:14:07
                      No penalty for lying in court. by VivianC2005-08-16 13:15:08
                        So you're saying... by Kickstart2005-08-16 13:28:10
                    So are the crosses on public property or private? by hyzenthlay2005-08-16 10:12:06
                      Criminal Mischief is a catch all by DesertRat662005-08-16 10:14:08
                        I like how you make an effort to portray yourself by Peace_man2005-08-16 10:28:52
                      Why does that matter? by Kickstart2005-08-16 10:24:34
                        If he did that with the chains then I would hope by classic_jon2005-08-16 10:40:31
                          Can anyone find confirmation... by VivianC2005-08-16 12:52:18
                            Start of the news cycle... by Kickstart2006-11-19 12:55:59
                              Found an American source by VivianC2006-11-19 12:55:59
                                But no mention of pipes or chains. (n/t) by VivianC2005-08-16 13:16:38
                        Yes. by hyzenthlay2005-08-16 10:54:29

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)