UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

So much for freedom of speech	by Kickstart	2006-11-19 12:55:59
Um...is there a slightly less biased source	by thread_killer	2005-08-16 07:22:11
Why certianly	by DesertRat66	2006-11-19 12:55:59
I wholly disagree, and more.	by Kickstart	2005-08-16 08:58:16
No one is abridging her rights	by DesertRat66	2005-08-16 09:11:31
She has a right to spout whatever nonsense she wants. What she doesn't have is the right to be listened to. The people in Crawford are sick of the theatrics. These protestors are camped in a public thoroughfare, impeding sparse traffic. Would I be laying on my horn going through there? Damn straight, I don't want to hit anybody being more stupid than they already are. I would imagine that the law enforcement agencies in Crawford are currently showing a lot of restraint towards this woman and the kooks down there with her. Technically they could go in there, tow their vehicles, and cite them for causing a traffic hazard. No one needs to discredit this woman, she is doing a great job all by herself. I doubt they has the slightest idea how the decent people who make this country work perceive them. It is not with any respect. It is with contempt and it's with sorrow. But it's also with this realization: This country, if it is to survive, cannot be turned over to people like her to lead and to run, because we will cease to exist as the United States the day that happens.
[ Reply ]
Way to bypass the point of my post.	by Kickstart	2005-08-16 09:17:37
How is it their choice?	by JPaganel	2005-08-16 09:25:18
There are?	by DesertRat66	2005-08-16 09:25:38
Protesting the protestors does not include	by Kickstart	2005-08-16 09:30:41
What is he under arrest for exactly?	by hyzenthlay	2005-08-16 10:00:12
Criminal Mischief	by DesertRat66	2006-11-19 12:55:59
Uh...he attached a pipe to his truck	by Kickstart	2005-08-16 10:07:55
I see no mention of a pipe	by DesertRat66	2005-08-16 10:12:13
Not welded to the front	by Kickstart	2006-11-19 12:55:59
Take a look at this. These are normal in that	by classic_jon	2005-08-16 10:26:52
Take a look at my other post on this	by Kickstart	2005-08-16 10:29:11
I saw the other post after this and responded to	by classic_jon	2005-08-16 11:14:07
No penalty for lying in court.	by VivianC	2005-08-16 13:15:08
So you're saying...	by Kickstart	2005-08-16 13:28:10
So are the crosses on public property or private?	by hyzenthlay	2005-08-16 10:12:06
Criminal Mischief is a catch all	by DesertRat66	2005-08-16 10:14:08
I like how you make an effort to portray yourself	by Peace_man	2005-08-16 10:28:52
Why does that matter?	by Kickstart	2005-08-16 10:24:34
If he did that with the chains then I would hope	by classic_jon	2005-08-16 10:40:31
Can anyone find confirmation...	by VivianC	2005-08-16 12:52:18
Start of the news cycle...	by Kickstart	2006-11-19 12:55:59
Found an American source	by VivianC	2006-11-19 12:55:59
But no mention of pipes or chains. (n/t)	by VivianC	2005-08-16 13:16:38
Yes.	by hyzenthlay	2005-08-16 10:54:29

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)