|
Just curious... evil_andy's anti-database post | by tnglives | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| Because it makes easy things hard but hard things |
by Concept |
2005-08-16 08:53:48 |
...possible?
I mean, really, how fast can you search a million row "database" that has everything written on paper? Crossreferenced with other pieces of paper holding related data that you need? A modern database can easily handle that...BUT you really have to take care to design your tables properly, with an eye to indices, foreign key constraints, etc.
OTOH, I do agree with the general sentiment. Some times paper and pen are all you need, in which case that's what you should use. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I prefer the Perl philosophy: | by LionsPhil | 2005-08-16 08:56:22 |
|
So long as nobody else has to read your code. | by tnglives | 2005-08-16 09:00:55 |
|
Isn't duct tape | by MatthewDBA | 2005-08-16 09:03:19 |
|
Well, duct tape is usually gray, so that works :) (n/t) | by Concept | 2005-08-16 09:03:24 |
|
Bah. | by LionsPhil | 2005-08-16 09:23:56 |
|
I remember a similar quote between VB and Delphi | by Concept | 2005-08-16 09:02:36 |
|
Perl is part of the problem | by evil_andy | 2005-08-16 09:22:09 |
|
What silly logic. | by LionsPhil | 2005-08-16 09:23:21 |
|
Almost all smart people have a C compiler, though. (n/t) | by fudje | 2005-08-16 09:24:42 |
|
Amen | by evil_andy | 2005-08-16 09:27:49 |
|
Favourite development enviroment? | by LionsPhil | 2005-08-16 09:34:32 |
|
Choose the right tool for the job? Blasphemy! :P (n/t) | by pyroteknix | 2005-08-16 09:36:06 |
|
Yeah, sorry. | by LionsPhil | 2005-08-16 09:39:21 |
|
Is that why you always have the wrong | by merlin | 2005-08-16 10:09:21 |
|
I dunna know... | by pyroteknix | 2005-08-16 10:29:55 |
|
They have assumed that everyone has | by evil_andy | 2005-08-16 09:41:56 |
|
Good grief, | by LionsPhil | 2005-08-16 09:45:36 |
|
Nowadays, it isn't the VB runtimes, it's | by Concept | 2005-08-16 09:52:15 |
|
*shudder* (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2005-08-16 09:53:36 |
|
That's a somewhat arrogant view, isn't it? (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2005-08-16 09:32:48 |
|
No less arrogant than | by wheresthefish | 2005-08-16 09:53:44 |
|
Not quite. | by LionsPhil | 2005-08-16 09:55:13 |
|
I thought we'd established that the really smart | by tnglives | 2005-08-16 10:03:15 |
|
I thought the really smart were used -by- their | by merlin | 2005-08-16 10:08:28 |
|
You know, | by wheresthefish | 2005-08-16 10:20:35 |
|
But it's "obligatory". *rolls eyes* (n/t) | by tnglives | 2005-08-16 10:24:51 |
|
Yes. | by fudje | 2005-08-16 10:29:19 |