|
First arrest in Iraqi Oil for Food scandal | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
And I wonder | by evil_andy | 2005-08-09 06:54:30 |
|
Consider this: | by RetiQlum2 | 2005-08-09 08:12:00 |
|
And if Bush had used those reasons, he would go | by toxin | 2005-08-09 08:19:02 |
|
But would he have "sold the public" on it? | by esbita | 2005-08-09 08:27:32 |
|
No they wouldn't have | by DesertRat66 | 2005-08-09 09:04:51 |
|
It's just the pot calling the kettle black. | by esbita | 2005-08-09 09:15:24 |
|
So, basically, Bush is looking like... | by Peace_man | 2005-08-09 09:33:03 |
|
Who is the bully, really? | by esbita | 2005-08-09 09:57:21 |
|
I don't think that simile fits. | by Peace_man | 2005-08-09 10:06:24 |
|
There wasn't going to be any due process | by DesertRat66 | 2005-08-09 10:09:52 |
|
And you know this because....? | by Peace_man | 2005-08-09 10:14:50 |
|
Thank you | by DesertRat66 | 2005-08-09 10:38:16 |
|
'If it doesn't work, throw it away'. | by Peace_man | 2005-08-09 11:12:23 |
|
You keep forgetting | by DesertRat66 | 2005-08-09 11:49:53 |
|
If you are serious about seeing terrorists | by Peace_man | 2005-08-09 12:41:34 |
|
Sorry treating terrorism like organized crime | by DesertRat66 | 2005-08-09 13:14:52 |
|
And how exactly did the Clinton Administration | by Peace_man | 2005-08-09 13:25:51 |
|
The idea was terrorism == Law Enforcement problem | by DesertRat66 | 2005-08-09 14:01:15 |
| That's a very interesting theory. Personally, |
by Peace_man |
2005-08-09 14:12:53 |
I think that you have that backwards. Crime is better approached proactively, since you have some responsibility and control over your own citizens, while terrorism is better approached by ignoring it (in the case of suicides, anyways), or at most trying to catch the immediate instigators. Something like England's approach, as a matter of fact.
Would you say that the US reflects your views on proactive crime approach? Do you know of statistics that reflect success rate? |
|
[ Reply ] |
