|
Did the jews learn to fight HIV | by hej | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
It's bogus | by Imp | 2005-08-04 11:44:07 |
|
The article said you can still get it if you are | by carthax | 2005-08-04 11:49:37 |
|
The study was unscientific. | by BloodyViking | 2005-08-04 11:55:43 |
|
The exposure is "randomised", just | by hej | 2005-08-04 11:59:47 |
|
Clarification on the term "randomised study". | by Pic | 2005-08-04 12:19:40 |
|
How do you give a placebo circumsision? :) (n/t) | by MikeCDN | 2005-08-04 12:25:52 |
|
That is of course a problem, | by Pic | 2005-08-04 12:35:10 |
|
Are you kidding? | by BloodyViking | 2005-08-04 12:42:55 |
|
The random factor there is sort of inevitable. | by Pic | 2005-08-04 12:59:25 |
|
The best option I can think of, | by BloodyViking | 2005-08-04 13:10:18 |
|
That would indeed be useful, | by Pic | 2005-08-04 13:14:27 |
|
The sample is far from large enough | by BloodyViking | 2005-08-04 13:22:17 |
| Side thought |
by MikeCDN |
2005-08-04 13:29:51 |
I wonder how long it is for a circumcision to heal, how long untill the man feels comfortable... using it... again, it can't be instantly I'm sure. So if the study started right after they were cut, there would be atleast a couple maybe more, months of recovering.
Also it takes HIV up to 3 months to show, so they halted the study with 18 months of research rather then 21, so... the circumsized men were in the field for maybe 15 months of the 18, whereas the un for 18 of the 18. Could be a cause for some of the discrepency |
|
[ Reply ] |
