The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Police shot non-terrorist in London by Kickstart2006-11-19 12:55:59
  From what I've been able to determine by wheresthefish2005-07-24 03:46:02
    Agreed. by LionsPhil 2005-07-24 07:55:30
(Also making the assumption that the police identified themselves before persuit; I believe that this is common practice unless there's a really good reason not to.)

A rather unfortunate situation all around, which I don't think could have been avoided. Guns don't have a "stun" setting.
[ Reply ]
      Stun bullets would actually be a nice invention... (n/t) by krikkert2005-07-24 08:01:36
        Oh, indeed. by LionsPhil2005-07-24 08:07:26
          Not to mention by TheGM2005-07-24 09:41:36
            Same reason they went for headshots... by McNutcase2005-07-24 09:47:58
              Well, that depends on the nature of the boom. by LionsPhil2005-07-24 10:24:20
                Based on the boom used on the 7th... by McNutcase2005-07-24 11:05:14
                  I dunno... by wheresthefish2005-07-24 11:09:33
                    Heh. by LionsPhil2005-07-24 11:14:37
                    It was what the stuff used on the 7th degrades to. by McNutcase2005-07-24 11:37:35
        *ahem* tranq darts by Kickstart2005-07-24 09:54:07
          Speed? by TheGM2005-07-24 09:57:19
            And that's only ONE of the reasons. (n/t) by McNutcase2005-07-24 10:00:29
          Several reasons. by McNutcase2005-07-24 10:00:07
            The potential lethality of non-lethal weapons by LionsPhil2005-07-24 10:25:45
              I agree wholeheartedly. by TheGM2005-07-24 10:40:46
          Er, because they don't fit the bill? by LionsPhil2005-07-24 10:23:29

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)