UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

ATTN: jmaxsohmer	by Liava	2006-11-19 12:55:59
My comment...	by threadjacker	2005-07-24 00:29:12
The example shown would best be coded as: if (<cond> && <othercond>) abort(); Breaking the multiple conditions into a series of nested 'if' statements runs the risk (in real life) of being open to misinterpretation. Subsequent coders may add additional statements between the first and second 'if's. Over time, this could result in the desired behaviour being corrupted. As for which method is more efficient at the assembly level... who cares? It's really not important. Seriously.
[ Reply ]
I also disagree with you	by Liava	2005-07-24 00:41:56
You're allowed :-)	by threadjacker	2005-07-24 01:07:18
I use both	by Liava	2005-07-24 01:15:54
Heh, I do that with the && version...	by imperito	2005-07-24 01:21:36
Not to pick on you	by Liava	2005-07-24 01:33:34
I like lisp, actually. And I like parens.	by imperito	2005-07-24 01:37:36
Or at least turns enough stuff red that...	by Liava	2005-07-24 01:39:43
You're so close :-)	by threadjacker	2005-07-24 01:34:41
Oh no	by Liava	2005-07-24 01:38:13
The indentation indicates that also.	by imperito	2005-07-24 01:39:03
No argument there....	by threadjacker	2005-07-24 01:44:47

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)