UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Ufie Ordnance Corner	by jayfarm	2005-06-17 15:24:02
NRA question	by Kickstart	2005-06-17 15:28:42
To my knowledge no.	by DesertRat66	2005-06-17 21:26:51
However, most if not all of the Second Amendment writings you will find refer to small arms. Specifically common weaponry carried by ground forces in combat. In today's world that would mean an M-16 variant, a Beretta M9 variant, and some kind of pump shotgun would be considered weapons specifically protected by the Second Amendment. Based on the history of the DCM which was originally founded with the purpose of making it easy for the un-organized militia to learn and maintain proficiency in arms. One could argue all U.S. Military issue arms from WWI to current date should be protected. As for deer rifles and duck shotguns... They are offered no such protection specifically.
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)