|
Jeb Bush can't let a dead woman die | by Kickstart | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I can see both sides of this | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 10:04:13 |
|
Wrong issue. | by BloodyViking | 2005-06-17 10:56:57 |
| No matter how you look at it 911 will get |
by classic_jon |
2005-06-17 11:04:26 |
investigated. That was why I worded it the way I did.
That was also why I said that they had to determine if there was an issue with the husband or 911. At this point we don't know, we are all guessing. You have to eliminate 911 as being responsible before you have cause to investigate the husband.
And yes, you are totally correct, theis should have been investigated when Jeb was not the governor. That is why I was frustrated at people blaming Jeb for it. was he there when it happenend, No. So then how is he responsible for the investigation not taking place in a timely manner, as others seem to want to blame him for. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
No blame to Jeb for not investigating it then. | by Peace_man | 2005-06-17 11:20:57 |
|
With a near zero chance | by BloodyViking | 2005-06-17 11:41:07 |
|
Why is it revenge motivated suddenly? | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 11:47:24 |
|
Sorry, but no. | by Kickstart | 2005-06-17 11:58:33 |
|
Jerk or not, is is not the responsibility | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 12:24:21 |
|
For one thing, | by BloodyViking | 2005-06-17 12:34:51 |
|
It is the contention of his lawyer that she would | by merlin | 2005-06-17 12:41:16 |
|
I interpereted the article as saying that now | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 12:43:23 |
|
Innocent until proven guilty. Unless married. | by toxin | 2005-06-17 14:34:00 |
|
1) It was not investigated because previous | by toxin | 2005-06-17 14:23:07 |
|
I will agree with you on all points except the | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 14:58:45 |
|
The thing is, the red herring simply acts to | by toxin | 2005-06-17 15:19:07 |
|
So, by your line of reasoning a suspected murderer | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 15:42:13 |
|
the new information jeb refers to | by gibuu | 2005-06-17 14:48:38 |
|
You have a valid point, but were not the parents | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 15:02:28 |
|
He is using the power of his position to | by Peace_man | 2005-06-17 12:10:04 |
|
The prosecutor has to abide by the law | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 12:29:34 |
|
How much fact finding do you think they need? | by Peace_man | 2005-06-17 12:53:22 |
|
How can he abuse it if it is in his job | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 13:05:53 |
|
I guess I have a different idea of what a | by Peace_man | 2005-06-17 13:31:20 |
|
Ok, to put it in those terms | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 13:41:31 |
|
He could make the request as innocent as | by Peace_man | 2005-06-17 14:00:01 |
|
So, from what you are saying it would not be | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 14:35:16 |
|
It wold not be illegal. He would be fired. | by toxin | 2005-06-17 14:49:15 |
|
How could he be fired if what he did was | by classic_jon | 2005-06-17 15:33:22 |
|
Courts are seperate | by rfrovarp | 2005-06-17 14:09:22 |
