The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Jeb Bush can't let a dead woman die by Kickstart2006-11-19 12:55:59
  I can see both sides of this by classic_jon 2005-06-17 10:04:13
As a person I am sick of hearng about it and wish it would stop. From a Management perspecive, if there is an issue with the 911 system that prevented help from arriving in a timely manner then that needs to be investigated and solved. It will also bring closure to the family emotionally to find out if there was or was not an issue with the husband and could prevent future legal action in this issue.

All in all it is a double edged sword any way you look at it. If he leaves it alone then people would say he wasn't doing anything about it. If he starts the research pre-emptively he heads off possible legal action by the parents for the 911 people not reacting fast enough.
[ Reply ]
    Seeing both sides . . . by hadji2005-06-17 10:10:00
      That raises the other thing I was about to by classic_jon2005-06-17 10:15:57
        Robert Martinez was governor (n/t) by rfrovarp2005-06-17 10:30:46
          Then why arent people hammering *him* by classic_jon2005-06-17 10:49:12
    Bush isn't calling for an investigation of 911... by quilting_kitty2005-06-17 10:53:15
      But they have to rule out any possibility by classic_jon2005-06-17 10:58:14
    Wrong issue. by BloodyViking2005-06-17 10:56:57
      No matter how you look at it 911 will get by classic_jon2005-06-17 11:04:26
        No blame to Jeb for not investigating it then. by Peace_man2005-06-17 11:20:57
          With a near zero chance by BloodyViking2005-06-17 11:41:07
          Why is it revenge motivated suddenly? by classic_jon2005-06-17 11:47:24
            Sorry, but no. by Kickstart2005-06-17 11:58:33
              Jerk or not, is is not the responsibility by classic_jon2005-06-17 12:24:21
                For one thing, by BloodyViking2005-06-17 12:34:51
                  It is the contention of his lawyer that she would by merlin2005-06-17 12:41:16
                  I interpereted the article as saying that now by classic_jon2005-06-17 12:43:23
                    Innocent until proven guilty. Unless married. by toxin2005-06-17 14:34:00
                1) It was not investigated because previous by toxin2005-06-17 14:23:07
                  I will agree with you on all points except the by classic_jon2005-06-17 14:58:45
                    The thing is, the red herring simply acts to by toxin2005-06-17 15:19:07
                      So, by your line of reasoning a suspected murderer by classic_jon2005-06-17 15:42:13
                the new information jeb refers to by gibuu2005-06-17 14:48:38
                  You have a valid point, but were not the parents by classic_jon2005-06-17 15:02:28
            He is using the power of his position to by Peace_man2005-06-17 12:10:04
              The prosecutor has to abide by the law by classic_jon2005-06-17 12:29:34
                How much fact finding do you think they need? by Peace_man2005-06-17 12:53:22
                  How can he abuse it if it is in his job by classic_jon2005-06-17 13:05:53
                    I guess I have a different idea of what a by Peace_man2005-06-17 13:31:20
                      Ok, to put it in those terms by classic_jon2005-06-17 13:41:31
                        He could make the request as innocent as by Peace_man2005-06-17 14:00:01
                          So, from what you are saying it would not be by classic_jon2005-06-17 14:35:16
                            It wold not be illegal. He would be fired. by toxin2005-06-17 14:49:15
                              How could he be fired if what he did was by classic_jon2005-06-17 15:33:22
                      Courts are seperate by rfrovarp2005-06-17 14:09:22

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)