|
This is a warning that should be put on all Bibles | by Bellator | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Old news, and while we're at it, go p*** | by adiplomat | 2005-05-17 03:54:02 |
|
Come on | by hej | 2005-05-17 03:56:14 |
|
It demeans, without any reason nor explanation, | by adiplomat | 2005-05-17 04:08:25 |
|
That's not the way I saw it. | by hej | 2005-05-17 04:45:22 |
|
Correction: | by hej | 2005-05-17 04:46:15 |
| As I told another poster, the post nor the |
by adiplomat |
2005-05-17 04:51:35 |
sticker, nor even Bellator's past history of posting, support that interpretation.
Based on all those things, I believe he meant it, and meant it explicitly as an insult.
Note I have NOT called for the mods, though I believe their intervention could be justified.
Even if he'd meant it exactly as you want to believe he did, he'd be liable for a (verbal) smacking, for the same reason that you don't leave a shotgun out for a child to play with. He made no attempt to explain his meaning, and so is liable for any "misinterpretations". Note that I wasn't even the first poster who called it a flame. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I guess you have a right to "verbally smack" | by hej | 2005-05-17 04:58:11 |
|
Nope. There are lines it is not safe to cross. | by adiplomat | 2005-05-17 05:05:07 |
|
I guess that in Israel, replacing the bible with | by hej | 2005-05-17 05:09:00 |
|
Again, there are no grounds for your | by adiplomat | 2005-05-17 05:20:25 |
|
Except that it is funny. | by hej | 2005-05-17 05:26:58 |
|
There are no lines | by joecrouse | 2005-05-17 05:12:19 |
|
I don't think that intervention could be | by Esteis | 2005-05-17 05:00:16 |
