The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

invisibility? by unjust2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Too tamed-down an article for me to say.. by bitflipper2005-05-11 10:23:10
    not to mention it wouln't work at night by Freakazoid2005-05-11 11:36:31
      I don't think that's what it does by bitflipper 2005-05-11 11:47:43
It's not a matter of light amplification, but of harmonic distortion. Again, I'm assuming quite a lot, here, because the article leaves much to be desired as far as elucidating theory goes. But, I think the idea is to build standing waves of electrons to interact with incoming photons of specific frequencies. The result isn't boosted light, but a semi-coherent reflection, instead. Our perception systems are geared to respond to non-coherent reflections. A semi-coherent one, therefore, would seem very difficult to focus on -- much like a mirage. (A fully coherent reflection would be like staring into a laser -- not recommended.) So, in effect, what this "invisibility shield" does is hide a real, solid object behind a shimmering mirage. Anyone who lives in an area with hot-enough summers knows this can happen even naturally. The big difference is that a natural mirage refracts light, whereas this shield is itself a solid object and reflects light.
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)