|
US Federal ID card bill passed. | by wheresthefish | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
good this is one thing i support. | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 05:21:05 |
| I don't think it's nearly that simple. |
by Ravenlock |
2005-05-11 06:03:31 |
As others have mentioned, if it can be made, it can be faked, and will be. Less people will be able to afford the fakes, most likely, but those people will be all the more dangerous.
Is it worth the potential increase in job security to accept a probable massive loss in privacy and individual/states rights? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Wait a second | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 07:08:26 |
|
National standards, OK. | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 07:13:51 |
|
I don't agree with compulsory carring, but | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 07:26:35 |
|
Privacy from government and privacy from industry | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 07:16:02 |
|
We have children who hack into the | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 07:22:26 |
|
I can't necessarily say that isn't true. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 07:29:24 |
|
Children who hack into the system do | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:09:08 |
|
You kind of missed my point, or ignored it | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:59:14 |
|
They already have access to that information via | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-11 07:46:40 |
|
Doesn't mean you should just roll over. | by McNutcase | 2005-05-11 07:55:40 |
|
Exactly. If it's just an SQL-statement away | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 07:59:12 |
|
Wait a minute | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-11 08:07:25 |
|
I think I'm going to apply for a governmental | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:10:46 |
|
It gets old. | by esbita | 2005-05-11 09:31:34 |
|
I've always found it just to be blah (n/t) | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:51:53 |
|
"Hey, this name popped up" - style queries. | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 08:11:34 |
|
do I need to post that ACLU video link? | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:14:46 |
|
Please do - not seen that one! (n/t) | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 08:16:43 |
|
sheesh | by voxwoman | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I'm sorry, my Google-fu is weak today. (n/t) | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 08:42:59 |
|
mine wasn't much better - | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:49:52 |
|
Didn't say you should | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-11 08:00:25 |
|
I agree with both of you. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 08:07:26 |
|
Oh, I emailed you, too, btw. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 08:08:24 |
|
Nothing showed up (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-11 09:11:02 |
|
Hrm. At the GMail one? | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 10:30:54 |
|
Re-sent. (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 10:37:49 |
|
Still nada | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-11 11:54:17 |
|
Nope. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 13:11:45 |
|
Okay, tried again. :) (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 13:14:08 |
|
"Criminals" like my husband who missed 2 weeks | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:04:12 |
|
Well considering the new bankruptcy laws | by MatthewDBA | 2005-05-11 08:06:57 |
|
Missing two weeks of child support paymentq | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:24:52 |
|
A warrant is a warrant | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:42:08 |
|
You have some factual errors. | by AndyA | 2005-05-11 09:22:55 |
|
You have a choice | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:05:12 |
|
You can get utilities without an SSN. | by AndyA | 2005-05-11 10:24:57 |
|
no it aint. | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:40:27 |
|
They may not require it | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:53:53 |
|
Odd. Was never a problem for me. | by AndyA | 2005-05-11 15:42:42 |
|
Didnt Ludwig Myer say that the more | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:26:44 |
