| US Federal ID card bill passed. |
by wheresthefish |
2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| Noone noticed. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Reg in bad taste again. | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 05:06:33 |
|
Bad taste, yes. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 05:25:30 |
|
The article is good, yes. | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 05:33:32 |
|
It's not the compulsory ID carrying that gets me | by VCA | 2005-05-11 05:40:11 |
|
So even when I am jogging | by airborneric | 2005-05-11 05:43:29 |
|
Or five bucks...it's up to you (n/t) | by VCA | 2005-05-11 06:16:41 |
|
So they keys to your house don't count? | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 06:20:11 |
|
the, not they. (n/t) | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 06:21:18 |
|
Lose-Lose situation there | by TheGM | 2005-05-11 06:54:39 |
|
And don't try to report the ID lost at a police | by chipmunk2 | 2005-05-11 07:01:11 |
|
Yes you do especialy where you are at. (n/t) | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:16:36 |
|
Worse yet, surely, | by LionsPhil | 2005-05-11 05:58:23 |
|
Agreed. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 06:07:07 |
|
The whole concept of tacking bills to other bills | by chipmunk2 | 2005-05-11 06:24:11 |
|
Maybe some politician should | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 06:27:25 |
|
I wish they would but it would be political | by classic_jon | 2005-05-11 06:53:40 |
|
"Give me your votes" | by bitflipper | 2005-05-11 06:55:12 |
|
And I'll bet the financial onus to "come up to | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 06:03:17 |
|
We have what, now? ;-) (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 06:06:49 |
|
I always thought we had 4 | by VCA | 2005-05-11 06:17:26 |
|
Five, in fact. | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 06:37:03 |
|
D'oh! How silly of me! (n/t) | by VCA | 2005-05-11 06:44:04 |
|
they already can do that whats the big deal. (n/t) | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:15:29 |
|
protection from all threats, domestic and foreign | by astro-g | 2005-05-11 05:27:23 |
|
Depends where you are. | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 05:37:59 |
|
s/Depends/Depends on/ (n/t) | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 05:38:21 |
|
In other news, nobody is suprised. | by LionsPhil | 2005-05-11 05:33:18 |
|
I know; I said "again". | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 05:36:41 |
|
I agree | by Freespirit | 2005-05-11 06:20:00 |
|
That is true, yes. | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 06:35:31 |
|
The US soldier's oath is | by frizzgrig | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I meant that that's what your current regime says | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 07:16:09 |
|
good this is one thing i support. | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 05:21:05 |
|
Will it, though? | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 05:30:11 |
|
If the card is anything like a maryland ID | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:14:14 |
|
It won't stop illegal employees who are | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 05:56:30 |
|
alot of placed dont even know they have illegals. | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:19:38 |
|
I don't think it's nearly that simple. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 06:03:31 |
|
Wait a second | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 07:08:26 |
|
National standards, OK. | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 07:13:51 |
|
I don't agree with compulsory carring, but | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 07:26:35 |
|
Privacy from government and privacy from industry | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 07:16:02 |
|
We have children who hack into the | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 07:22:26 |
|
I can't necessarily say that isn't true. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 07:29:24 |
|
Children who hack into the system do | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:09:08 |
|
You kind of missed my point, or ignored it | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:59:14 |
|
They already have access to that information via | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-11 07:46:40 |
|
Doesn't mean you should just roll over. | by McNutcase | 2005-05-11 07:55:40 |
|
Exactly. If it's just an SQL-statement away | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 07:59:12 |
|
Wait a minute | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-11 08:07:25 |
|
I think I'm going to apply for a governmental | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:10:46 |
|
It gets old. | by esbita | 2005-05-11 09:31:34 |
|
I've always found it just to be blah (n/t) | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:51:53 |
|
"Hey, this name popped up" - style queries. | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 08:11:34 |
|
do I need to post that ACLU video link? | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:14:46 |
|
Please do - not seen that one! (n/t) | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 08:16:43 |
|
sheesh | by voxwoman | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I'm sorry, my Google-fu is weak today. (n/t) | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 08:42:59 |
|
mine wasn't much better - | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:49:52 |
|
Didn't say you should | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-11 08:00:25 |
|
I agree with both of you. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 08:07:26 |
|
Oh, I emailed you, too, btw. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 08:08:24 |
|
Nothing showed up (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-11 09:11:02 |
|
Hrm. At the GMail one? | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 10:30:54 |
|
Re-sent. (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 10:37:49 |
|
Still nada | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-11 11:54:17 |
|
Nope. | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 13:11:45 |
|
Okay, tried again. :) (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 13:14:08 |
|
"Criminals" like my husband who missed 2 weeks | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:04:12 |
|
Well considering the new bankruptcy laws | by MatthewDBA | 2005-05-11 08:06:57 |
|
Missing two weeks of child support paymentq | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:24:52 |
|
A warrant is a warrant | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:42:08 |
|
You have some factual errors. | by AndyA | 2005-05-11 09:22:55 |
|
You have a choice | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:05:12 |
|
You can get utilities without an SSN. | by AndyA | 2005-05-11 10:24:57 |
|
no it aint. | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:40:27 |
|
They may not require it | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:53:53 |
|
Odd. Was never a problem for me. | by AndyA | 2005-05-11 15:42:42 |
|
Didnt Ludwig Myer say that the more | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:26:44 |
|
If you really want to stop them | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 06:47:45 |
|
if it's anything like what they were asking | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 07:59:27 |
|
8 bucks an hour is pretty high paying out here. | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:29:38 |
|
Report the temp agency. | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 10:50:37 |
|
hahahh report the temp agency? | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 13:14:05 |
|
I don't mind standardizing the ID | by airborneric | 2005-05-11 05:42:17 |
|
What about when they "smart chip" the ID cards | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 05:59:34 |
|
just carry an EMI shielded wallet (n/t) | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-11 06:36:56 |
|
Once through the microwave should do (n/t) | by tallastro | 2005-05-11 06:38:58 |
|
That is awsome.hehehehe (makes mental note) (n/t) | by classic_jon | 2005-05-11 09:00:21 |
|
*Nod* It might eventually in this country, | by Ravenlock | 2005-05-11 06:06:17 |
|
I guess I'm going to save my old | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 06:05:06 |
|
I thought everyone was already | by MatthewDBA | 2005-05-11 08:04:37 |
|
My old license expires in August | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:13:22 |
|
My fiancee doesn't drive | by MatthewDBA | 2005-05-11 08:17:12 |
|
"What part of 'shall not be abridged'..." | by bitflipper | 2005-05-11 06:32:43 |
|
US government already stamped all over the Fifth | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 06:36:10 |
|
Voter backlash. | by Esteis | 2005-05-11 06:42:04 |
|
Ummm...it has been manditory for all | by classic_jon | 2005-05-11 06:52:44 |
|
support-the-troops blackmail... | by out2lunch | 2005-05-11 07:13:15 |
|
...I do hope that this was meant to be funny... | by jpprater | 2005-05-11 07:35:22 |
|
And you think they won't? | by McNutcase | 2005-05-11 07:39:30 |
|
I'd be laughing a lot harder... | by bitflipper | 2005-05-11 08:02:40 |
|
This is not something to laugh about. | by McNutcase | 2005-05-11 08:08:23 |
|
True enough. | by bitflipper | 2005-05-11 08:29:26 |
|
id have taken it from you too. | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 10:36:07 |
|
If I'm reading that right... | by McNutcase | 2005-05-11 11:18:49 |
|
Im a security guard now we are paid to be | by joecrouse | 2005-05-11 13:17:47 |
|
No you're not. | by McNutcase | 2005-05-11 13:30:55 |
|
I hate to say it but homeland security tends to | by classic_jon | 2005-05-11 08:11:15 |
|
Exactly. (n/t) | by McNutcase | 2005-05-11 08:12:41 |
|
I think it's time for a re-watching of "Brazil" | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:17:08 |
|
Oh, by the way... | by McNutcase | 2005-05-11 08:17:41 |
|
Ssshhhh, they'll be banning stage pyros next. (n/t | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 08:18:40 |
|
You and Peter Wragg can form an underground, then. (n/t) | by McNutcase | 2005-05-11 08:21:22 |
|
Stage pyros? Gunpowder?? | by bitflipper | 2005-05-11 08:37:23 |
|
Heck, fine flour works pretty well. | by Tomo | 2005-05-11 08:39:55 |
|
True, but volatiles are easier... | by bitflipper | 2005-05-11 09:22:21 |
|
They were looking for a BOOM!! like a pipe bomb | by classic_jon | 2005-05-11 08:45:33 |
|
I would have been so locked up if things | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 08:48:41 |
|
Nitrogen tri-iodide, anyone? | by bitflipper | 2005-05-11 09:32:05 |
|
Chem major friend did that as a "joke" on | by classic_jon | 2005-05-11 09:37:34 |
|
Thermiting locks? | by McNutcase | 2005-05-11 09:38:54 |
|
small amounts of acid from a pipette work too ;) | by classic_jon | 2005-05-11 10:50:17 |
|
someone in our high school "spilled" | by voxwoman | 2005-05-11 10:52:34 |
|
* writes that idea down * | by bitflipper | 2005-05-11 11:02:52 |
|
'tis the number of the beast. (n/t) | by greybeaver | 2005-05-11 07:55:01 |
|
Comes into effect just about the time | by AndyA | 2005-05-11 08:55:52 |