|
National Day of Prayer | by BloodyViking | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
There us no problem here.... | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 10:38:02 |
|
Yes, there is. | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 10:47:44 |
|
The act of prayer | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 11:17:34 |
| "Object of worship" implies a being. |
by BloodyViking |
2005-05-05 11:27:40 |
If he was, he would be unable to attend the religious services of his choice, violating his freedom to worship as he pleased.
Wrong. He can do as he pleases as a man, but when acting in an official capacity, he Must not show preference for one religion over another. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Here's an interesting thought | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-05 11:40:46 |
|
Nope. | by McNutcase | 2005-05-05 11:44:09 |
|
Do you have a specific source | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 11:51:19 |
|
He's a part of the Government. | by McNutcase | 2005-05-05 11:53:12 |
|
There are a lot of people who fall into | by frizzgrig | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
You do realize, don't you, | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 12:32:54 |
|
I know, but you also realize | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 12:42:35 |
|
where..... | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 15:21:31 |
|
Company time | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-05 12:38:54 |
|
No. Even though, in his case, his residence | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 11:57:25 |
|
So there's nothing really wrong with | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-05 12:35:23 |
|
Not a thing. | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 14:01:25 |
|
Let me propose a scenerio | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 13:04:30 |
|
No, OBJECT means | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 11:44:07 |
|
"Object of worship" != "object". | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 12:06:55 |
|
What about | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 12:11:47 |
|
You mean Gaia? Mother Nature? ;-) | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 12:19:52 |
|
NO | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 12:34:04 |
|
That would infringe on his 1st amendment right (n/t) | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 15:18:36 |
