| National Day of Prayer |
by BloodyViking |
2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
Way to ignore separation of Church and State.
Dubya's babblings |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
This isn't anything new | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-05 10:20:33 |
|
This is the 54th, according to another article. | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 10:30:33 |
|
I have no problem with a National Day of Prayer | by toxin | 2005-05-05 11:39:04 |
|
Was there a Rabbi there? | by RigbyReardon | 2005-05-05 12:12:30 |
|
Maybe one was invited and couldn't attend? | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-05 12:46:13 |
|
You Must be Older Than You Type | by Psyop | 2005-05-05 13:38:15 |
|
You should have heard me banging on earlier... | by McNutcase | 2005-05-05 10:22:00 |
|
well, it's perfectly logical... | by niwikki | 2005-05-05 10:26:55 |
|
True... | by McNutcase | 2005-05-05 10:28:51 |
|
"In God we trust" ? | by chipmunk2 | 2005-05-05 10:27:22 |
|
Given that... | by McNutcase | 2005-05-05 10:30:29 |
|
It also presumes the existence of a god | by Tomo | 2005-05-05 10:31:26 |
|
I think it argues for no official state religion | by plblark | 2005-05-05 10:33:01 |
|
No. The founders didn't put "God" on the money. | by BloodyViking | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
The story | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
BTW | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 11:11:06 |
|
I prefer my money not to say anything | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-05 11:30:06 |
|
"Help! Help! | by LionsPhil | 2005-05-05 11:39:30 |
|
A goodbye would be nice... (n/t) | by evilsysadmin | 2005-05-05 11:45:50 |
|
I prefer a "hello". (n/t) | by McNutcase | 2005-05-05 11:47:20 |
|
I don't like explanation two | by nedludd | 2005-05-05 10:34:16 |
|
That is a bit of arrogance in itself. | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 11:01:56 |
|
Nit to pick | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 12:20:20 |
|
No to mention | by LionsPhil | 2005-05-05 11:12:37 |
|
It isn't A state, it is The State | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 10:35:41 |
|
As it was explained by a law teacher I had in | by evilsysadmin | 2005-05-05 10:38:22 |
|
But it should. | by Tomo | 2005-05-05 10:46:59 |
|
'tis on the money, must be Mammon. (n/t) | by greybeaver | 2005-05-05 10:51:08 |
|
There us no problem here.... | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 10:38:02 |
|
Yes, there is. | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 10:47:44 |
|
The act of prayer | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 11:17:34 |
|
"Object of worship" implies a being. | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 11:27:40 |
|
Here's an interesting thought | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-05 11:40:46 |
|
Nope. | by McNutcase | 2005-05-05 11:44:09 |
|
Do you have a specific source | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 11:51:19 |
|
He's a part of the Government. | by McNutcase | 2005-05-05 11:53:12 |
|
There are a lot of people who fall into | by frizzgrig | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
You do realize, don't you, | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 12:32:54 |
|
I know, but you also realize | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 12:42:35 |
|
where..... | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 15:21:31 |
|
Company time | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-05 12:38:54 |
|
No. Even though, in his case, his residence | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 11:57:25 |
|
So there's nothing really wrong with | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-05 12:35:23 |
|
Not a thing. | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 14:01:25 |
|
Let me propose a scenerio | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 13:04:30 |
|
No, OBJECT means | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 11:44:07 |
|
"Object of worship" != "object". | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 12:06:55 |
|
What about | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 12:11:47 |
|
You mean Gaia? Mother Nature? ;-) | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 12:19:52 |
|
NO | by frizzgrig | 2005-05-05 12:34:04 |
|
That would infringe on his 1st amendment right (n/t) | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 15:18:36 |
|
What if you believe in multiple Makers? | by kyrasantae | 2005-05-05 12:35:09 |
|
the truth. | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 10:51:26 |
|
Thine God would be a little stressed, | by greybeaver | 2005-05-05 10:59:17 |
|
of course there is also that part in the bible | by evilsysadmin | 2005-05-05 10:59:26 |
|
that's true | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 11:04:21 |
|
You can blame that on... | by Illiad | 2005-05-05 11:00:46 |
|
that I can agree with. | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 11:05:52 |
|
Readable version (including proper caps): | by Pic | 2005-05-05 11:02:32 |
|
THX (n/t) | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 11:06:39 |
|
1138? (n/t) | by greybeaver | 2005-05-05 11:07:35 |
|
"The audience is disintegrating"? (n/t) | by wheresthefish | 2005-05-05 11:22:35 |
|
I've never seen that additional text to #2 :-) (n (n/t) | by plblark | 2005-05-05 11:17:00 |
|
Bill of Rights *IS* part of the Constitution | by kapnkrunch | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Ummm yes and no | by DesertRat66 | 2005-05-05 12:33:37 |
|
I realize that, however... | by kapnkrunch | 2005-05-05 12:44:11 |
|
The COnstitution is subject to repeal, itself. (n/t) | by kelli217 | 2005-05-05 13:56:34 |
|
I'll start considering truth from religions when | by tallastro | 2005-05-05 11:20:56 |
|
Truth <> Organized Religion | by Havoc | 2005-05-05 12:08:48 |
|
Please learn to use whitespace. | by BloodyViking | 2005-05-05 11:21:56 |
|
here is one | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 15:44:22 |
|
"Also I am a hardware geek not an HTML code geek. | by shorty82 | 2005-05-05 19:53:35 |
|
Thanks | by jedikahuna | 2005-05-05 20:18:30 |
