|
I refuse to ignore ESR's definition of Hacker..... | by Jeff_UK | 2005-05-03 01:16:33 |
|
hacker == bad, hacker == bad, hacker == bad....... (n/t) | by Jeff_UK | 2005-05-03 01:22:32 |
| Can't you do a comment at the end of your answer? |
by Esteis |
2005-05-03 01:27:40 |
"For the purposes of this exam, I have used the followin definition of hacker: [hacker == bad].
However, I object to using the word hacker in this sense; people who break into others' computers are crackers, not hackers; instead, I define hacker as: [hacker == good]."
I know that my religion exams would be filled to the rim with comments about things/premises that I disagreed on, or thought that we shouldn't be required to know. ("Why/in what way was Pilate cowardly?" springs to mind....) |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
People who break in | by SciSSorS | 2005-05-03 01:35:56 |
|
People who break in | by Electric Storm | 2005-05-03 01:43:23 |
|
Because the prof's right! | by adiplomat | 2005-05-03 01:42:09 |
|
But can't we stick to the old-fashioned sense? | by Esteis | 2005-05-03 02:00:38 |
|
Object to it all you want, | by krikkert | 2005-05-03 02:02:16 |
|
Not often | by pverdon | 2005-05-03 02:39:22 |
|
Well, It's not a massive problem, it just grates. (n/t) | by Jeff_UK | 2005-05-03 02:47:38 |
|
Because that's been the accepted | by adiplomat | 2005-05-03 02:09:19 |
|
I Am A Hacker | by Jeff_UK | 2005-05-03 02:32:09 |
|
No. The prof isn't right. | by RetiQlum2 | 2005-05-03 02:28:05 |
|
Well you are really describing a kind of cracker.. | by shana | 2005-05-03 04:11:00 |
