|
Gun threads | by Kickstart | 2005-03-22 12:46:24 |
| I have to say that I don't agree. |
by LionsPhil |
2005-03-22 12:58:43 |
I don't see why the 'gun crowd' should need to ease off on posting threads about guns. Lots of other vagaries of geekism are allowed to run their course -- look at the amount of gaming threads.
The *problem* threads, IMO, are those that are there just to take at cheap shot at the other side. DR66 has been posting disappointly many recently, in an uncomfortable echo of his pre-election "Republican frothing".
(Conversely, he also tends to post the most interesting non-attacking gun threads, like the Box of Truth.) |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Kindly take account of both sides of that. | by McNutcase | 2005-03-22 13:00:37 |
|
I would love to know | by thread_killer | 2005-03-22 13:02:00 |
|
Expect an e-mail. (n/t) | by McNutcase | 2005-03-22 13:02:26 |
|
I belive he is refering to me (n/t) | by pseudonym | 2005-03-22 13:03:54 |
|
probably a lot of people who're thinking that (n/t | by nebuchanezzar | 2005-03-22 13:06:29 |
|
about themselves, not you, sorry (n/t) | by nebuchanezzar | 2005-03-22 13:06:48 |
|
McNutcase: Care to clarify? | by pseudonym | 2005-03-22 13:08:53 |
|
Seconded. | by chrisP | 2005-03-22 13:13:29 |
|
i dunno. i'd probably be proud of the title though | by nebuchanezzar | 2005-03-22 13:17:50 |
|
personally, i think | by nebuchanezzar | 2005-03-22 13:15:50 |
|
Isn't he the one who did all those meaningless TLP | by jmaxsohmer | 2005-03-22 13:19:01 |
|
Yes. | by arktus | 2005-03-22 13:21:44 |
|
Whatever happened to him anyway? | by jmaxsohmer | 2005-03-22 13:22:37 |
|
Not a clue. (n/t) | by arktus | 2005-03-22 13:31:46 |
|
It's ME! Who else is as confoozled as me? (n/t) | by Havoc | 2005-03-22 13:16:59 |
|
I think LionsPhil is, | by LionsPhil | 2005-03-22 13:20:10 |
|
You are. (n/t) | by EvilLionsPhil | 2005-03-22 13:22:18 |
|
I am! (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2005-03-22 13:23:25 |
|
The Evil one | by Fandango | 2005-03-22 13:33:27 |
|
Now we just HAVE to know! | by pseudonym | 2005-03-22 13:29:25 |
|
Aye. | by LionsPhil | 2005-03-22 13:02:09 |
|
DR66 tends to post the most sailent rebuttals | by pseudonym | 2005-03-22 13:06:18 |
|
im not the frother of that child (n/t) | by nebuchanezzar | 2005-03-22 13:03:13 |
|
Luke. I am your frother. (n/t) | by PsychoI3oy | 2005-03-22 13:27:11 |
|
No! That's wrong! | by jmaxsohmer | 2005-03-22 13:29:32 |
|
I HAVE NO FROTHER! (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2005-03-22 13:29:49 |
|
Luke's not a farmer, Owen. | by nebuchanezzar | 2005-03-22 13:36:14 |
|
Isn't it sad that I've memorized the scripts? | by jmaxsohmer | 2005-03-22 13:43:52 |
|
I think that it is even sadder that you can name | by Sweethart | 2005-03-22 17:03:35 |
|
I agree. | by run.dll | 2005-03-22 13:13:08 |
|
I think we have a silent majority | by Feng_Li | 2005-03-22 13:15:04 |
|
Invoke(Grammar UFies) | by Feng_Li | 2005-03-22 13:16:48 |
|
Pretty sure that it should be "ignore". (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2005-03-22 13:17:46 |
|
Singular. (n/t) | by jmaxsohmer | 2005-03-22 13:17:51 |
|
In this case, singular. | by arktus | 2005-03-22 13:18:02 |
|
Aw, but the singular is ignores. | by RetiQlum2 | 2005-03-22 13:29:58 |
|
The angry mob ignores the cries for mercy. (n/t) | by arktus | 2005-03-22 13:31:14 |
|
The majority ignores it. | by jmaxsohmer | 2005-03-22 13:32:47 |
|
Thanks guys! (n/t) | by Feng_Li | 2005-03-22 13:21:09 |
|
I agree, just don't read what you don't want | by evilsysadmin | 2005-03-22 13:46:34 |
