The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Source of Roszko's guns (including H&K full auto by toxin2006-11-19 12:55:59
  I'm calling bovine scatology on this by DesertRat662005-03-22 09:28:13
    Your saying the Globe and Mail lies???? by pseudonym2005-03-22 09:39:33
      Are they a news agency? by DesertRat662005-03-22 09:54:40
        I wouldn't expect a crime reporter by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:07:01
          The facts are unclear by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:22:05
            you are nit picking by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:27:09
              I disagree by run.dll 2005-03-22 10:46:03
Fact checking is a necessary part of competent reportage. A lack of familiarity with a subject is certainly no excuse for not checking the facts - quite the contrary. I was confused by the "fully semi" term. Terminology is not a trivial point when dealing with such matters and shouldn't be dismissed as mere semantics. You are right, however, that a full and careful reading of the article leads to the conclusion that "full auto" capability was involved.

As for our (Canada's) experience with mass shootings, I wonder if the ratio of mass shootings to population is that much different (for the last two decades, say). IIRC, we have had one (Lepine), so an equivalent number south of the border would be about nine since 1985 or so. Have there been many more than that?
[ Reply ]
                there were no incorrect facts by pseudonym2005-03-22 11:01:39
                  No such suggestion stated or implied (n/t) by run.dll2005-03-22 11:03:41

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)