The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Source of Roszko's guns (including H&K full auto by toxin2006-11-19 12:55:59
  I'm calling bovine scatology on this by DesertRat66 2005-03-22 09:28:13
First the article calls it a semi-fully automatic rifle, WTF is that?!?! I've never heard of them. Secondly if it was a fully automatic weapon they are quite heavily regulated in the United States. So much so that no crime has been committed with a legally owned fully automatic weapon since the 1930s. Furthermore, anything newer than 1986 has been banned for civilian ownership. Additionally the Semi-Automatic H&K has been banned from importation into the United States since GWB the first.

Your third paragraph is the only valid statement you make. How did the firearms manage to slip through the borders? They manage to slip into the United States' borders all the time as well. There have been Vietnam issue M16s listed as lost in country that have turned up in the U.S. during drug raids. That might be a good clue right there.
[ Reply ]
    Your saying the Globe and Mail lies???? by pseudonym2005-03-22 09:39:33
      Gun could have originated in Canada. Depending on by techi8702005-03-22 09:46:33
        The reports ar that the guy got his guns by toxin2005-03-22 09:50:00
          And like I said by DesertRat662005-03-22 09:56:18
            he could get a fake one like mine... by scragman2005-03-22 10:11:44
              Replacing about half the gun. by JPaganel2005-03-22 10:32:11
                I figured as much... by scragman2005-03-22 10:39:25
        The artical doesn't mention by pseudonym2005-03-22 09:51:27
          I'm sure that is something that they are still by techi8702005-03-22 09:56:16
            At least he didn't shoot himself in the foot by SnArL2005-03-22 10:02:28
            definatly by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:11:35
      "fully automatic or rapid fire" by PsychoI3oy2005-03-22 09:51:28
        Same S*** different pile by pseudonym2005-03-22 09:54:41
      Are they a news agency? by DesertRat662005-03-22 09:54:40
        Reporters, especially Canadian ones, are not up on by toxin2005-03-22 10:01:33
          I guess they don't have internet access either? by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:20:26
        I wouldn't expect a crime reporter by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:07:01
          The facts are unclear by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:22:05
            you are nit picking by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:27:09
              So would any journalism professor by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:32:36
                Last freaking time! It was 14 YEARS ago! by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:48:31
                  And yet you claim to have experience with the FN by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:55:05
                    Thank you! by pseudonym2005-03-22 11:13:07
                      As for the FN... by pseudonym2005-03-22 11:15:25
                        Now I know you're blowing smoke by DesertRat662005-03-22 13:14:08
                      Which begs the question by DesertRat662005-03-22 11:32:54
                        That sounds better than a bench test. (n/t) by RetiQlum22005-03-22 14:12:16
              I disagree by run.dll2005-03-22 10:46:03
                there were no incorrect facts by pseudonym2005-03-22 11:01:39
                  No such suggestion stated or implied (n/t) by run.dll2005-03-22 11:03:41
              Wrong actually. by BloodyViking2005-03-22 10:57:05
                Still doesn't negate the artical by pseudonym2005-03-22 11:31:15
                  It does call it into question by DesertRat662005-03-22 11:39:04
                    Not to mention that by BloodyViking2005-03-22 12:15:38
          I would. by JPaganel2005-03-22 10:27:40
      "Sounds like"? "Selector switch"? by kelli2172005-03-22 10:02:01
        Excellent by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:13:24
          Since this is not about guns... by kelli2172005-03-22 15:00:29
    In reply: by toxin2005-03-22 09:46:06
      Answers by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:02:31
        So kits are illegal, are partial kits? by toxin2005-03-22 10:15:57
          Yes by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:42:26

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)