The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Source of Roszko's guns (including H&K full auto by toxin 2006-11-19 12:55:59
.308 rifle that killed the 4 Mounties)?
"Most of his guns had been smuggled into Canada illegally from the United States, according to Mr. Roszko's friends."

Proper gun control in Canada will always be impossible as long as the US is a cheerful supplier of illegal weapons to Canada.

I hate that your (US gunpowder) addiction gives us problems. If he could not re-supply from his American sources (and how did a convicted felon get through the border anyways?), would he have had the automatic weapon used to kill the 4 cops (only 3 of whom were armed at the time)?

The police did try to get this guy's guns, but he hid them very well, on a farm which allows for good hiding.

Click
[ Reply ]
  Full Auto? by run.dll2005-03-22 09:21:36
    it did full auto, just slowly :) (n/t) by nebuchanezzar2005-03-22 09:26:12
    Garbled reporting. Police actually said by toxin2005-03-22 09:30:15
    I blame it on a Journalist who is writing about by techi8702005-03-22 09:43:50
      Just READ it by pseudonym2005-03-22 09:46:48
        Sounds like they aren't willing to say what it was by techi8702005-03-22 09:50:46
        No. It sounds like They Won't Say by BloodyViking2005-03-22 10:48:14
          One line.. h*ll WORD doesn't a bad artical make by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:54:59
    This isn't some dinky little paper here. by pseudonym2005-03-22 09:43:58
  sorry by nebuchanezzar2005-03-22 09:24:39
  I'm calling bovine scatology on this by DesertRat662005-03-22 09:28:13
    Your saying the Globe and Mail lies???? by pseudonym2005-03-22 09:39:33
      Gun could have originated in Canada. Depending on by techi8702005-03-22 09:46:33
        The reports ar that the guy got his guns by toxin2005-03-22 09:50:00
          And like I said by DesertRat662005-03-22 09:56:18
            he could get a fake one like mine... by scragman2005-03-22 10:11:44
              Replacing about half the gun. by JPaganel2005-03-22 10:32:11
                I figured as much... by scragman2005-03-22 10:39:25
        The artical doesn't mention by pseudonym2005-03-22 09:51:27
          I'm sure that is something that they are still by techi8702005-03-22 09:56:16
            At least he didn't shoot himself in the foot by SnArL2005-03-22 10:02:28
            definatly by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:11:35
      "fully automatic or rapid fire" by PsychoI3oy2005-03-22 09:51:28
        Same S*** different pile by pseudonym2005-03-22 09:54:41
      Are they a news agency? by DesertRat662005-03-22 09:54:40
        Reporters, especially Canadian ones, are not up on by toxin2005-03-22 10:01:33
          I guess they don't have internet access either? by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:20:26
        I wouldn't expect a crime reporter by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:07:01
          The facts are unclear by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:22:05
            you are nit picking by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:27:09
              So would any journalism professor by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:32:36
                Last freaking time! It was 14 YEARS ago! by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:48:31
                  And yet you claim to have experience with the FN by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:55:05
                    Thank you! by pseudonym2005-03-22 11:13:07
                      As for the FN... by pseudonym2005-03-22 11:15:25
                        Now I know you're blowing smoke by DesertRat662005-03-22 13:14:08
                      Which begs the question by DesertRat662005-03-22 11:32:54
                        That sounds better than a bench test. (n/t) by RetiQlum22005-03-22 14:12:16
              I disagree by run.dll2005-03-22 10:46:03
                there were no incorrect facts by pseudonym2005-03-22 11:01:39
                  No such suggestion stated or implied (n/t) by run.dll2005-03-22 11:03:41
              Wrong actually. by BloodyViking2005-03-22 10:57:05
                Still doesn't negate the artical by pseudonym2005-03-22 11:31:15
                  It does call it into question by DesertRat662005-03-22 11:39:04
                    Not to mention that by BloodyViking2005-03-22 12:15:38
          I would. by JPaganel2005-03-22 10:27:40
      "Sounds like"? "Selector switch"? by kelli2172005-03-22 10:02:01
        Excellent by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:13:24
          Since this is not about guns... by kelli2172005-03-22 15:00:29
    In reply: by toxin2005-03-22 09:46:06
      Answers by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:02:31
        So kits are illegal, are partial kits? by toxin2005-03-22 10:15:57
          Yes by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:42:26
  I was just going to post the same thing. A couple by techi8702005-03-22 09:31:51
    On Ikea... SWMBO and I are discussing. by toxin2005-03-22 09:35:10
  This is part of what has me so very angry by pseudonym2005-03-22 09:33:04
    I think some of the blame has to go to the by techi8702005-03-22 09:48:42
      OTOH, the fact of all those charges did bring by toxin2005-03-22 09:55:21
        Are you saying it's the RCMPs fault now? by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:24:48
      No doubt! by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:00:52
  Yep - darn those nasty guns for making people by Havoc2005-03-22 09:50:40
    I blame the access to illegal guns from the vast by toxin2005-03-22 09:59:44
      Which is why I get SO ticked off by run.dll2005-03-22 10:13:17
        1 Billion dollars would have paid an extra 1,700 by techi8702005-03-22 10:16:49
          Agreed by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:28:48
        that isn't quite correct about the registry by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:22:09
          the gun registry is still over budgt. It's full of by techi8702005-03-22 10:29:11
            someone also regisered a sodering iron by pseudonym2005-03-22 10:37:21
              ROFL by DesertRat662005-03-22 10:45:56
  Isn't Canada responsible for its own border? by JPaganel2005-03-22 10:35:54
    Since *WE* were blamed for enabling "9/11" by kahuana2005-03-22 10:49:07
      We know our government is screwing up. by JPaganel2005-03-22 10:51:18
    No, of course we aren't. by run.dll2005-03-22 10:55:02
      You must have fun meetings with the Mexican govt! (n/t) by Feng_li2005-03-22 11:14:40
    You mean the cutline in the trees? by techi8702006-11-19 12:55:59
      I can't believe anyone could get by by tallastro2005-03-22 11:20:57
        You haven't seen her in a bad mood. (n/t) by techi8702005-03-22 11:33:00
  And your suggestion is...? by BeanBandit2005-03-22 15:41:02

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)