|
Remember the protestor flattened by an IDF Bulldoz | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
But of course, | by veran | 2005-03-16 09:06:19 |
|
Heckler&Koch | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 09:26:15 |
|
In Kabul you can walk down the marketplace... | by RetiQlum2 | 2005-03-16 09:35:50 |
|
On man with a knife? | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 09:44:01 |
|
Here's something for you to read | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Question for you | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 11:32:52 |
|
Yes, but not "done." | by z1root | 2005-03-16 13:12:26 |
| I am a 23 year old, 5'5", slightly overweight |
by Sweethart |
2005-03-16 13:22:10 |
woman. I do not move fast and I have extremely poor upper body and lower body strength. If a 6'2 man - the average height of most men I know - came at me with a knife, I would not be able to defend myself. However, if I had a gun and I had been trained to use it in self-defense - I would be able to defend myself and might walk away from the experience.
A friend of mine had a man climb in her bathroom window, take a knife out of her kitchen, and come at her with it. She had a gun in her bedside table and unloaded four bullets into his chest when he was 12 inches away from him. He still managed to stab her in the face 3 times, once in the neck, and slash her chest before he passed out and began to die.
The police arrived 15 minutes after her silent alarm went off and she had lost so much blood that she nearly died. However, had she not had that weapon - my friend who is just under 5'3 and weighs maybe 110 lbs when she's soaking wet would have definately been raped and murdered. And the man who she shot? He died on the scene and his DNA was traced back to 3 rapes and murders in the area.
Rachel |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Thanks. You make my points rather well. :-) | by z1root | 2005-03-16 13:31:24 |
|
I wouldn't take that to the bank yet | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
That is the skill part that I mentioned. | by z1root | 2005-03-16 16:04:07 |
|
I believe... | by DesertRat66 | 2005-03-16 16:51:53 |
|
Accepted. No problem. :-) | by z1root | 2005-03-16 17:17:25 |
|
Not an easy post.. | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 13:59:55 |
|
OMFG | by DesertRat66 | 2005-03-16 14:29:03 |
|
Then why doesn't NYC have a lower crime rate than | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 14:35:15 |
|
NYC has the most stringent gun laws in the country | by JPaganel | 2005-03-16 14:46:18 |
|
Canadian handgun aquisition. | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 14:53:55 |
|
And just what do we have in New York? | by JPaganel | 2005-03-16 15:03:06 |
|
Hope that enlightens you | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 15:33:43 |
|
NY state laws do not apply in NYC. | by JPaganel | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Please read the sections in the link | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 16:15:42 |
|
There are NO sections in your link | by JPaganel | 2005-03-16 16:23:34 |
|
and again, a joke compaired to REAL gun control | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 16:17:07 |
|
Which is what it is in NYC. | by JPaganel | 2005-03-16 16:26:48 |
|
In addition to which | by JPaganel | 2005-03-16 16:55:28 |
|
that is because it isn't needed | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 17:14:58 |
|
How about the original point? | by JPaganel | 2005-03-16 17:21:20 |
|
simple | by Dailator | 2005-03-16 17:40:05 |
|
Federal law prohibits | by JPaganel | 2005-03-16 17:44:10 |
|
how about enforcement? | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 17:53:44 |
|
Don't change the subject. | by JPaganel | 2005-03-16 18:01:49 |
|
It does, because that control is country wide | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 18:50:06 |
|
I repeat. | by JPaganel | 2005-03-16 19:32:22 |
|
and the crime rate is still FAR greater than say | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 20:50:53 |
|
repeat: population density. | by plblark | 2005-03-16 15:28:45 |
|
I agree with plblark | by Jaz | 2005-03-16 16:33:02 |
|
Then compare Vancover with Seatle | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 17:16:25 |
|
That hospital stat might not be a good | by ManiacJoe | 2005-03-16 17:21:32 |
|
I belive it was a W5 report. | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 17:47:35 |
|
Valid points, but not exactly the ones I made. | by z1root | 2005-03-16 17:12:37 |
|
sorry if I miss quoted | by pseudonym | 2005-03-16 22:42:58 |