The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Request for Windows advice by tully2005-03-15 09:38:01
  Get XP -- it's much mroe stable than 2K. <n/t> by carthax2005-03-15 09:39:56
    xp? more stable than 2k? hardly (n/t) by Freakazoid2005-03-15 09:42:14
      is .. is not .. is ... is not ... by chrisP2005-03-15 09:52:36
        but have you ever ran 2k? by Freakazoid2005-03-15 09:56:12
          I've run both by Liava 2005-03-15 11:07:20
On multiple machines for years. I find both of them are stable (though uptime just isn't nearly as good as Linux or other *nix machines). However, I can offer an explanation why XP is often considered less stable.

I had a friend who worked with ATI and he gave me a good explanation: XP, when it comes to core OS services, is, in fact, more stable than 2K, but, due to the increased reliance on the graphics driver with all the new eye candy and such, there are more crashes. The problem is the video card driver (I don't remember the number he quoted, but it was responsible for a very large percentage of crashes).

If you update to the latest video drivers and disable most of the eye candy, I would guess that WinXP would crash far less than 2K.
[ Reply ]
            already done by Freakazoid2005-03-15 11:13:02

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)