The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Repost from last night... by Sweethart 2006-11-19 12:55:59
Clicky

I just have to share this story for those who didn't get to see it.

This story made me laugh it's so funny. Oh what people will believe these days. And, since it is in print - it MUST be true.

One glaring hole I saw in the discussion was that if Saddam had been shooting back at troops - they would have unloaded their weapons at him. Another glaring hole - there are far too many reporters in Iraq, most of them WITH THE TROOPS for something like this to go unnoticed and unreported. Then there's the fact that there is no way the Marines would have handed the "victory" over the Army - like DR66 said. If this was stage the Marines would have been the ones to "find him" in the spiderhole.

And, no one gave a rat's rear end HOW we found him - we just cared THAT we found him. The last thing the US wants is another Bin Laden.

Rachel
[ Reply ]
  Interestingly by thread_killer2005-03-10 05:19:28
    I could venture a guess as well by airborneric2005-03-10 05:33:20
  Your arguments aren't valid. by Spud312005-03-10 05:34:57
    I never did see a reporter when on missions by airborneric2005-03-10 05:45:19
      Heh...I've seen one by thread_killer2005-03-10 05:56:20
    It says in the article that this was during a fire by Sweethart2005-03-10 06:03:12
      It said they were looking for him for 3 days. by Spud312005-03-10 06:12:04
  The thing that kinda gets me... by jdelphiki2005-03-10 05:39:12
    Speaking as a non-fan of the US (government): by toxin2005-03-10 09:02:16
      Actually by thread_killer2005-03-10 10:00:40
  Snopes didn't say anything by PsychoI3oy2006-11-19 12:55:59

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)