UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

The reality of children, or why have so many.	by Peace_man	2005-03-08 12:37:38
But it doesn't work at all.	by BloodyViking	2005-03-08 12:46:11
Possibly. But at least with children there is a	by Peace_man	2005-03-08 12:54:17
Without children, you can afford to squirrel	by NOLAWitch	2005-03-08 20:21:21
away money toward your retirement. With children, you have to feed, clothe and buy school supplies until you have little or no money left over. They're an expensive hobby. If you're foolish enough to pin your hopes on your kids taking care of you, you deserve to end up in some hellhole of a nursing home. The money flow between a parent and a child is usually downward. There should be no expectation of an upward flow of resources. Since kids don't ask to be born, the onus of their care is on the parent who chose to bring them into the world. Kids owe their parents nothing.
[ Reply ]
Perhaps in strict equity terms, yes	by MatthewDBA	2005-03-08 20:34:58
And if spewing offspring were anything but a	by NOLAWitch	2005-03-08 20:44:43
I'm not claiming that one ought to expect	by MatthewDBA	2005-03-08 20:56:06

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)