|
"Deep Throat" to be re-released... | by Sweethart | 2005-02-08 10:41:47 |
|
FWIW, it's a boring movie | by Kickstart | 2005-02-08 10:45:44 |
|
The government is in my bedroom? Kinky. | by Sweethart | 2005-02-08 10:48:26 |
|
I do, and I think you are utterly wrong. | by Kickstart | 2005-02-08 10:58:06 |
|
And I don't care what you think (n/t) | by Sweethart | 2005-02-08 10:59:07 |
|
well, you could at least try and back your play | by plblark | 2005-02-08 11:07:54 |
|
Good point... here's my reply. | by Sweethart | 2005-02-08 11:16:11 |
|
wow, that's pretty bad. | by plblark | 2005-02-08 11:22:06 |
|
pblark: these weren't porno mags... | by Sweethart | 2005-02-08 11:23:31 |
|
Huh? | by Kickstart | 2005-02-08 11:25:40 |
|
These were locally made mags much worse than FHM | by Sweethart | 2005-02-08 11:29:11 |
|
OMG, a nipple! | by Kickstart | 2005-02-08 11:31:18 |
|
Like I said... this is my personal belief. | by Sweethart | 2005-02-08 11:32:38 |
|
You seem to be suggesting... | by swisscheese | 2005-02-08 14:00:13 |
|
Why? | by YakkoWarner | 2005-02-08 14:08:17 |
| Because tabacco is at least demonstrably harmful.. |
by swisscheese |
2005-02-08 14:25:35 |
| even when used as intended, is highly visible, is marketed (despite the industry's disproven claims to the contrary) to minors and young people, is actually addictive, etc...? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
And if I were to show you reports | by YakkoWarner | 2005-02-08 14:32:16 |
|
AFAIK, pr0n isn't *universally* addictive, . . . | by HadEnuf | 2005-02-08 14:39:32 |
|
I was suggesting a stronger case could be made | by swisscheese | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I fail to see how the primate research is relevant | by YakkoWarner | 2005-02-08 15:15:16 |
|
credible = real research, done to discover | by swisscheese | 2005-02-08 15:31:17 |
|
Of late? | by HadEnuf | 2005-02-08 18:37:35 |
