|
US uses napalm in Iraq -- do you think it's true? | by Esteis | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Not napalm. something else. (n/t) | by joecrouse | 2005-02-08 11:59:05 |
|
like using kerosene instead of "petrol"? | by dire_lobo | 2005-02-08 12:12:03 |
|
Body bags -- "transport tubes"?! | by Esteis | 2005-02-08 12:16:32 |
|
In your own link, there's a clear denial | by romandas | 2005-02-08 12:24:30 |
|
They're playing a word game. | by Esteis | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Handheld firearms and artillery are similar too, | by romandas | 2005-02-08 12:36:56 |
|
Is that meant as a serious answer? | by Esteis | 2005-02-08 12:40:39 |
|
I have little else in the way of proof except for | by romandas | 2005-02-08 12:45:42 |
|
Hey! My opinion IS likely to change | by Esteis | 2005-02-08 12:58:51 |
| i have to disagree about sick weapons. |
by unjust |
2005-02-08 13:18:18 |
for things thrown at enemies:
pestilent and infectious corpses, or live infectious persons, feces, powdered lye, mustard gas, vx gas, numerous pathogens, and accellerants designed to create firestorms rather than just burn locally.
for other things:
fire oxen. cytotoxic and neurotoxic poisons on weapons. poisoning water supplies.
napalm really isn't that bad as far as horrible ways to die go. it's not nice, but it's reasonably quick and painless in comparison to diseases or injuries that take days or weeks to kill.
that said, i'll again say that war is NOT a good thing, nor is killing people in general.
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
To quote a few great military commanders | by DesertRat66 | 2005-02-08 13:34:04 |
|
Powedered lye | by joecrouse | 2005-02-08 13:42:10 |
|
it's quite bad whenyou inhale a fine air borne | by unjust | 2005-02-08 13:49:25 |
|
The lime spreader used to run all day, | by joecrouse | 2005-02-08 13:53:58 |
|
i'm afraid i mispoke, but you're still wrong. | by unjust | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
well, not wrong per se, but it has, and can be | by unjust | 2005-02-08 14:20:23 |
|
I never said it wasnt dangerous | by joecrouse | 2005-02-08 19:04:38 |
